Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Case of the Serrano-Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador

Judgment of March 1, 2005
(Merits, Reparations and Costs)

In the Case of the Serrano Cruz Sisters,
the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or
“the Court”), composed of the following judges∗:
Sergio García Ramírez, President
Alirio Abreu Burelli, Vice President
Oliver Jackman, Judge
Antônio A. Cançado Trindade, Judge
Cecilia Medina Quiroga, Judge
Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Judge, and
Alejandro Montiel Argüello, Judge ad hoc;
also present,
Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and
Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary;

pursuant to Article 63(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter
“the Convention” or “the American Convention”) and Articles 29, 31, 56 and 58 of
the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”),1 delivers
this judgment.

On June 14, 2003, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 50 and 61 of
the American Convention, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
(hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) filed an
application against the State of El Salvador (hereinafter “the State” or “El Salvador”)
before the Court, originating from petition No. 12,132, received by the Secretariat of

Judge Diego García-Sayán excused himself from hearing this case in accordance with Articles
19(2) of the Court’s Statute and 19 of its Rules of Procedure.

This judgment is delivered under the Rules of Procedure adopted by the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights at its forty-ninth regular session in an order of November 24, 2000, which entered into
force on June 1, 2001, and under the partial reform adopted by the Court at its sixty-first regular session
by an order of November 25, 2003, in force since January 1, 2004.

Select target paragraph3