INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF GUDIEL ÁLVAREZ ET AL. (“DIARIO MILITAR”) v. GUATEMALA JUDGMENT OF AUGUST 19, 2013 (Interpretation of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs) In the case of Gudiel Álvarez et al. the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) composed of the following judges: 1 Diego García-Sayán, President Leonardo A. Franco, Judge Margarette May Macaulay, Judge Rhadys Abreu Blondet, Judge, and Alberto Pérez Pérez, Judge; also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter also “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court 2 (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), decides the request for interpretation of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs delivered by the Court on November 20, 2012, in this case (hereinafter also “the Judgment”), filed on March 20, 2013, by the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”). I REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 1. On November 20, 2012, the Court delivered the Judgment, which was notified to the parties and to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) on December 21 that year. 1 Judge Manuel E. Ventura Robles did not take part in the deliberation and signature of this Judgment of interpretation for reasons beyond his control. In addition, Judge Eduardo Vio Grossi, for reasons beyond his control, had not taken part in the deliberation and signature of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs in this case; therefore, pursuant to Article 68(3) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure, he did not take part in the deliberation and signature of this Judgment. 2 The Court’s Rules of Procedure approved by the Court at its eighty-fifth regular session held from November 16 to 28, 2009.