2 accordance with the provisions set out in Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request the State to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, not later than January 31, 2005, a detailed report on the measures adopted in order to comply with the obligation to investigate the facts for the purpose of identifying and punishing those responsible for the human rights violations referred to in the judgment on the merits, and with other reparations ordered by [the] Court that have not been complied with […]. 3. To request the victim, or his representative, if any, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit comments on the State report mentioned in the foregoing operative paragraph within a period of four and six weeks respectively, following receipt thereof. 4. To continue monitoring compliance with the orders of the Court pursuant to the Judgments of September 29, 1999 (merits) and May 31 (reparations). [...] 6. The report submitted by the State of Peru (hereinafter “the State” or “Peru”) on February 1, 2005, whereby, after having been granted an extension, it informed that: (f. 463) a) the State requested the General Director of the Administración del Ministerio de Justicia (the Administration Office of the Ministry of Justice) to calculate interest accrued “six months after notice” of the Judgment on reparations and to proceed to secure the provision of adequate funds for the payment of default interest on the amount of compensation for moral damage; b) by means of Order No. 17 A.V 15-2001 of January 30, 2004, the Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia del Perú (Criminal Chamber of the Peruvian Supreme Court of Justice) upheld the decision rendered by the Vocal Supremo Instructor (Investigative Chief Justice) that convicted Mr. Raúl Aurelio Talledo-Valdivieso of abuse of power against Mr. Cesti-Hurtado and sentenced him to a four-year term in prison, the execution of which was suspended for a period of three years, conditioned upon compliance with rules of conduct; c) the Secretaría Ejecutiva de la Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos (Office of the Executive Secretary of the National Commission on Human Rights) sent official letters to the Ministerio de Justicia (Ministry of Justice) (November 4, 2004), Ministerio de Economía (Ministry of Economy) (November 11, 2004), President of the Fondo Especial de Administración del Dinero Obtenido Ilícitamente en Perjuicio del Estado (Special Fund for the Administration of Illegally Obtained Money to the Detriment of the State) (hereinafter, “the FEDADOI”) (November 17, 2004), the General Director of the Oficina General de Economía y Desarrollo (General Office of Economy and Development) (December 10, 2004) and the General Director of the Administración del Ministerio de Justicia (Administration Office of the Ministry of Justice) (December 10, 2004) in reference to the payment of the compensation ordered by the Inter-American Court in the instant case, which has not been complied with. d) On January 18, 2005 the Judiciary informed that the criminal proceedings brought against Mr. Cesti-Hurtado for crimes against the judicial function were closed. In addition, by means of Final Judgment of September 14, 2000 the pre-trial investigation proceedings No. 5296-0117 against Mr. CestiHurtado for the crimes of disobedience, violating the duty and dignity of the

Select target paragraph3