INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CASE OF CASA NINA V. PERU
JUDGMENT OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2021
(Interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits,
Reparations, and Costs)
In the case of Casa Nina v. Peru,
the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or
“the Court”), composed of the following judges:
Elizabeth Odio Benito, President;
L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire, Vice President;
Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge;
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, Judge;
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, Judge;
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, Judge; and
Ricardo Pérez Manrique, Judge;
also present,
Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and
Romina I. Sijniensky, Deputy Secretary,
pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter also
“the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Article 68 of the Court’s Rules of
Procedure (hereinafter also “the Rules of Procedure”), decides on the requests for
interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs
issued by this Court in this case on November 24, 2020 (hereinafter also “the
judgment”). The requests were filed on March 12, 2021, by the victim’s representative
(hereinafter also “the representative”) and on March 18, 2021, by the Republic of Peru
(hereinafter “the Peruvian state,” “the State,” or “Peru”).
1