ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* OF NOVEMBER 18, 2010** CASE OF ALMONACID ARELLANO V. CHILE MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter "the Judgment") issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Inter-American Court", "the Court" or "the Tribunal") on September 26, 2006, whereby, regarding reparations, it ruled the following: 5. The State must ensure that Decree Law 2.191 does not continue to hinder the continuation of investigations into the extrajudicial execution of Mr. Almonacid Arellano and the identification and, where appropriate, the punishment of those responsible, as stated in paragraphs 145 to 157 of [the] Judgment. 6. The State must ensure that Decree Law 2.191 does not continue to hinder the investigation, prosecution and, if applicable, the punishment of those responsible for other similar violations in Chile, as stated in paragraphs 145 to 157 of [the] Judgment. 7. The State must reimburse the costs and expenses within one year following the notification [of the] Judgment, in accordance with paragraph 164 of [the] Judgment. 8. The State must execute the publications listed in paragraph 162 of the [...] Judgment, within six months following the notification thereof. 2. The briefs of June 5, June 29 and August 29, 2007, May 30 and August 12, 2008, February 12 and July 14, 2009, and their respective annexes, whereby the Republic of Chile (hereinafter "the State" or "Chile") provided information on compliance with the Judgment. 3. The communications of December 18 and 29, 2008, whereby the representative of the victim and next-of-kin (hereinafter "the representative") sent copies of two domestic decisions taken in connection with the investigation of the facts in the present case. 4. The notes of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter "the Secretariat") of August 10, January 6, February 17 and September 17, 2009, whereby, following the Presidency of the Court's instructions (hereinafter "the Presidency"), it requested the * Judge Eduardo Vio Grossi, of Chilean nationality, did not take part in the deliberation or signing of the present Order, in accordance with the provisions of Article 19(2) of the Statute of the Court and Article 19 and 21 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, approved during the LXXXV Extraordinary Sessions held from 16 to 28 of November, 2009. ** Order adopted by the Court in its XLII Extraordinary Sessions, held in Quito, Ecuador from November 15 to 19, 2010.