52 171. The State must comply with its obligations through payment in United States dollars. 172. The payments ordered in this Judgment as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages and reimbursement of costs and fees, may not be affected, reduced, or conditioned due to current or future taxes or charges. Therefore, they must be paid in full to the beneficiaries in accordance with the present Judgment. 173. If the State falls in arrears, it shall pay interests over the amount due, corresponding to bank interest on arrears in Ecuador. 174. In accordance with its consistent practice, the Court retains the authority inherent to its competence, to monitor compliance with this Judgment. The case will be closed once the State has fully implemented all of the provisions of this Judgment. Within one year of notification of this Judgment, Ecuador must present a report of the measures taken in its compliance to the Court. XV OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 175. Therefore, THE COURT, DECLARES: Unanimously, that: 1. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Rigoberto Acosta Calderón, the Right to Personal Liberty enshrined in Article 7(1), 7(3), and 7(5) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 70, 71, 81, and 84 of this Judgment. 2. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Rigoberto Acosta Calderón, the Right to Personal Liberty and Judicial Protection enshrined in Articles 7(6) and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 97, 99, and 100 of this Judgment. 3. The State violated, in detriment of Mr. Rigoberto Acosta Calderón, the Right to a Fair Trial enshrined in Articles 8(1), 8(2), 8(2)(b), 8(2)(d), and 8(2)(e) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with Article 1(1) of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 107, 108, 114, 115, 119, 120, and 124 through 127 of this Judgment. 4. At the time in which the facts occurred, the State breached its obligation established in Article 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights in connection with Article 7(5) of the same, in the terms of paragraphs 135 and 138 of this Judgment. 5. This Judgment is, per se, a form of reparation in the terms of its paragraph 159. AND DECIDES: