objection to [the witnesses proposed by the Commission] being heard when the
public hearing takes place.”
12.
The Order of the President of the Court of February 6, 2003, in which he
decided:
1.
To summon the representatives of the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights and the State of Venezuela to a public hearing to he held at the seat of the InterAmerican Court, at 10.30 a.m. on February 17, 2003, to receive the statements of the
said witnesses and for the Court to hear their viewpoints on the facts and circumstances
relating to the implementation of the provisional measures in the Liliana Ortega et al.,
Luis Uzcátegui, and Luisiana Ríos et al. cases.
[…]
4.
To summon Luisiana Ríos to appear before the Inter-American Court of Human
Rights at 10.30 a.m. on February 17, 2003, to give testimony on “[t]he threats, and
physical and verbal attacks that [she has] received from Government supporters in
Venezuela, during the exercise of her work as a journalist during the last year (as of
January 2002).”
5.
To summon Armando Amaya to appear before the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights at 10.30 a.m. on February 17, 2003, to give testimony on “[t]he threats,
physical and verbal attacks that [he has] received from Government supporters in
Venezuela, during the exercise of his work as a journalist during the last year (as of
January 2002).”
[…]
13.
The public hearing on these provisional measures held at the seat of the
Inter-American Court on February 17, 2003. There appeared before the Court:
For the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights:
Eduardo Bertoni, delegate;
Carlos Ayala, assistant, and
Pedro Nikken (assistant)
For the State of Venezuela:
Jorge Dugarte Contreras, agent, and
Gisela Aranda, assistant.
14.
The testimony of Armando Amaya, given during the public hearing, which is
summarized as follows:
a)
He is a Venezuelan national, resident in Caracas, a camera assistant photographic reporter - for the company Radio Caracas Televisión. Owing to
his work, one day while covering a news item in the Cajigal Observatory, he
and his team were attacked by some Government supporters, who shouted
verbal abuse at them, insulted them, threw stones and, despite this, they
were unable to obtain help from any official. They were able to exit into the
avenue, where they were attacked by “motorcyclists, by people [who threw]
stones [at them], shouted slogans that [they] were charlatans, who should
not be there.”
b)
On another occasion, while he and his team were covering a news
item, a soldier approached to warn them that they should not be in that area
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents