TABLE OF CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE ¡ERROR! MARCADOR
NO DEFINIDO.
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT
5
III JURISDICTION
6
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
6
A. Preliminary objection of “fourth instance”
6
A.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission
6
A.2. Considerations of the Court
7
B. The Court’s lack of jurisdiction to examine arguments concerning the right to work
7
B.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission
7
B.2. Considerations of the Court
8
V PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
9
A. Determination of presumed victims
9
A.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission
9
A.2. Considerations of the Court
9
B. The factual framework of the case
10
B.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission
10
B.2. Considerations of the Court
10
VI EVIDENCE
100
A. Admissibility of the documentary evidence
10
B. Admissibility of the testimonial and expert evidence
12
VII FACTS
12
A. Applicable legal framework
12
B. Appointment of Julio Casa Nina as Provisional Deputy Provincial Prosecutor
14
C. Termination of the presumed victim’s appointment
15
D. Appeal mechanisms filed by the presumed victim
15
D.1. Appeal for review
15
D.2. Application for amparo
16
D.3. Remedy of appeal
16
D.4. Appeal lodged before the Constitutional Court
17
VIII MERITS
17
VIII.1 JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, POLITICAL RIGHTS AND RIGHT TO WORK, IN
RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND TO ENSURE RIGHTS AND TO
ADOPT DOMESTIC LEGAL PROVISIONS, AND ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE
PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY, PROTECTION OF HONOR AND DIGNITY, AND EQUALITY
BEFORE THE LAW
17
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties
17
A.1. Enhanced stabillity for prosecutors
17
A.2. Judicial guarantees and the principle of legality
18
2