5 issued by the Central Bank and the Monetary Board of Ecuador, as well as several documents from the Ecuadorian Department of Work and Human Resources, concerning the pay scales for domestic employees and drivers from 1992 to 1996. (infra 29 et seq.) 17. On October 27, 1998 Mr. Suárez Rosero submitted information concerning his psychiatric treatment and that of his wife, Mrs. Margarita Ramadán Burbano, and the expenses of one of his representatives, Mr. Alejandro Ponce Villacís. 18. On November 24, 1998 the State submitted a communication, in which it stated that “it would not be able to accept the [new] amounts claimed [by Mr. Suárez Rosero], especially when the man referred to was convicted as an accessory after the fact by the Ecuadorian Courts,” and it added that during the public hearing it had made “a concrete offer of an amount of compensation, a maximum amount that [...] it could accept, considering the grave economic crisis it was suffering.” 19. On December 22, 1998 the Court required that Mr. Suárez Rosero submit his marriage certificate with Mrs Ramadán Burbano and the birth certificate of his daughter, the minor Micaela Suárez Ramadán. This requirement was satisfied on January 14, 1999. IV EVIDENCE A) DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 20. Mr. Suárez Rosero submitted the following documentary evidence with his brief on reparations: a. documents concerning his income and labor occupation before his detention (cfr. copy of the contract for professional services signed in the city of Quito on March 1, 1991 between Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero and the Challenge Air Cargo Company; 16 income receipts from the Challenge Air Cargo Company in the name of Iván Suárez; income tax statements from the Challenge Air Cargo Company dated April 26, May 28, June 27, July 29, August 28, September 30, October 28, November 28, December 30, 1991, January 28, February 28, March 30, April 28, May 28, and June 26, 1992; estimate of income (unidentified document); document entitled “Challenge Air Cargo/No. flights/UIO”); b. a document concerning the state of his mental health (cfr. August 4, 1997 psychological evaluation of Mr. Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero performed by psychologist Cecilia Jaramillo); c. document concerning the appeal of his conviction. (copy of the appeal filed by Mr. Rafael Iván Suárez Rosero before the President of the Superior Court of Justice on September 11, 1996);

Select target paragraph3