10 the additional suffering caused by the facts of the case to the next of kin of fourteen murdered and missing victims whose remains have not yet been delivered to said next of kin, in addition to the aforementioned amount (operative paragraph 8(e)); compensation for the non pecuniary damages in connection with abridgment of the right to fair trial, due process and access to an effective remedy, of the next of kin of the 37 murdered and missing victims (operative paragraph 8(f)); compensation for the non pecuniary damages in connection with abridgment of the right to fair trial, due process and access to an effective remedy, of the next of kin of the four persons who died in the context of the facts of this case, but whose death was not attributed to the State in the judgment on the merits because there was no acknowledgment of State responsibility in connection with them (operative paragraph 8(g)); and compensation for the non pecuniary damages in connection with abridgment of the right to fair trial, due process and access to an effective remedy, of the three victims of injuries in connection with the right to humane treatment (operative paragraph 8(h)); a) the parameters set forth by the Court of the compensations ordered in operative paragraph eight (operative paragraph nine); b) payment to the Comité de Familiares de las Víctimas (COFAVIC) of the incidents between Februrary-March 1989 as reimbursement of the legal costs and expenses generated by actions under domestic venue and before the inter-American system, and to cover future expenses in connection with compliance with the […] Judgment (operative paragraph ten), and c) publication, in a reasonable time, in the official gazette and in a newspaper with national circulation, of chapter I, Filing of the Case, paragraph 1 subparagraphs a), b), c), d), e), f) and (a) and the operative points included in chapter VII of the judgment on the merits and paragraphs 66 to 66.16 of the judgment on reparations (operative paragraph five). 9. While overseeing comprehensive compliance with the Judgment on reparations issued in the instant case, and after analyzing the information supplied by the State, by the Inter-American Commission and by the representatives of the victims and their next of kin in their briefs on compliance with reparations (supra Having Seen 3, 4, 5, 8 to 14, 16 and 17), the Court notes that it does not have sufficient information on the following points regarding which compliance is pending: a) actions taken to investigate, identify, and administratively and criminally punish, with all the conditions and characteristics set forth in the judgment (operative paragraph one); a) actions taken to locate, exhume, identify, and deliver to their next of kin the mortal remains of some of the victims (operative paragraph two); b) if there were exhumations, whether the State covered the costs and took into account the place chosen by the next of kin to bury the mortal remains of the persons to whom operative paragraph two refers (operative paragraph three); c) steps taken to avoid repetition of the circumstances and facts of the instant case (operative paragraph four subparagraphs a), b) and c), and