2 d. Suspension of issuing of new main or supplementary deeds, or ownership certificates or any other real rights to areas within the territory, until definitive delimitation, demarcation, and titling have been carried out. e. Development and implementation of appropriate measures to ensure definitive suspension of all logging in the territory by third parties not belonging to the community and without prior agreement with it. f. Official communication at the highest level with all relevant agents of the State, at all levels, regarding the content and scope of the judgment of the Court, together with an appeal to take appropriate action to avoid third parties foreign to the community conducting activities that may impair the existence, value, use, or enjoyment of the resources that exist in the territory. g. Official, individualized communication to all third parties who occupy or conduct activities in areas within the territory, regarding the content and scope of the judgment of the Court, together with an appeal to not expand the current areas of occupation and use, to not promote settlement by new persons, and to not conduct logging activities without previously consulting with the Community, until delimitation, demarcation, and titling of the lands of the Community has been carried out. 4. The additional statement by the representatives of the Community, in their request for provisional measures, that: a) “[c]ontrary to the explicit order of the Court, the State of Nicaragua [...] has not avoided detriment to the property located within the geographical area where the members of the Community live and conduct their activities, by third parties foreign to the Community itself and acting without its consent” and that these facts “endanger the effectiveness of the rights recognized by the Court, threaten the Community with irreparable damage, and hinder the process of demarcation, delimitation, and titling of the lands of the Community;” b) the judgment of the Court on the merits and reparations in the instant case requires that “until the delimitation, demarcation and titling of the lands of Awas Tingni has been done, the State must abstain from any acts that might lead the agents of the State itself, or third parties acting with its acquiescence or its tolerance, to ‘impair the existence, value, use or enjoyment of the property located in the geographic area where the members of the Awas Tingni Community live [...]’;” c) in its judgment, the Court imposed upon the State a dual duty: “the duty of abstaining, as regards the agents of the [S]tate itself” (to abstain from impairing the existence and use of property located in the lands used by the Community); “and the duty to monitor and ensure immediate suspension of actions by third parties who have not obtained the consent of the Community;” d) the Community has repeatedly “called the attention” of the State to these facts, and Nicaragua has not fulfilled its specific commitment to take actions in this regard, and it “has allowed the invasion of traditional lands of the Community and illegal exploitation of its resources to continue, contrary to what the Court specifically ordered,” especially in connection with agricultural activities and logging in the area, and e) there is a need for Provisional Measures to be adopted to maintain the status quo of the Community and to ensure compliance with the judgment of