3 Apart from the need to obtain justice, the Commission considers the case presents issues of public Inter-American order. Specifically, the instant case will allow to the Inter-American Court to pronounce about the problematic of the extrajudicial executions favored by the social stigmatization of teenagers of low income as possible criminals. In the Case Servellon Garcia and Others v. Honduras, the Inter-American Court pronounced in general terms of this situation and the Commission considers that the instant case offers elements that allow deepening in a matter of mayor relevance and actuality to the continent. The instant case constitutes a manifestation of a lack of control and mechanisms of accountability in the interior of the police institutions, specifically when new “anti-gangs” units are created with the objective to confront a specific sector of the population that, under the American Convention is subject of a special protection. Moreover, the case presents fundamental aspects about how a State should respond, in terms of justice, to a severe fact of an extrajudicial execution of a teenager by a police designated to protect the population. This case presents the particularity of having a condemnatory judgment for the crime of “non intentional homicide”. The reasons why it has been considered by the Commission as a source of impunity, transcends the family of the victim and affects the inter-American public order in a context of necessary strengthening of the inter-American standards in matter of justice of severe violations of human rights, such as the extrajudicial executions. The Commission considers of the inter-American public order that the Courts takes again its jurisprudence about the minimum components that an investigation of the death of a person should have, specially when a police is responsible of the death of a child. Taking in count the existence of one version of “accidental homicide” or “of encounter”, the Court has the opportunity to establish the minimum obligations that this type of versions impose to the authorities in charge of an investigation of this nature in order to ensure, through all the possible ways, a clarification of the events and, consequently, a proportional punishment. Considering that this matter affects significantly the Inter-American public order, according to the article 35.1 f) of the Rules of the Inter-American Court, the Commission would also like to offer the two following expert’s statements: A person whose name will be informed shortly, who will refer to the obligations that imposes the international law on human Rights in matter of special protection to children and teenagers, in the frame of the exercise of the police functions, when the States formulates policies to respond to problematic such as the functioning of gangs. The expert will refer to the standards in matter of prevention of abuses, including arbitrary privations of life, by the state security personnel in the frame of security policies that might have a specific impact in children and teenagers. A person whose name will be informed shortly, who will refer to the International standards in matter of access to justice in cases of extrajudicial executions. Taking in count the high incidence of this type of investigations of versions of “encounters” or “accidental death” in this type of investigations, the expert will offer to the Court a perspective about the minimum diligences that should be realize to overcome the obstacles that these versions could have in the clarification of the truth and obtaining justice to the family of the victim. The expert’s CV will be included in the Merits Report 33/13. Finally, the petitioners expressed the victims’ interest in the submission of the present case to the Inter-American Court and informed that the following shall be representatives of the victims: