Order of the
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
of September 4, 2004
Provisional Measures regarding Venezuela
Matter of “Globovisión” Television Station
HAVING SEEN:
1.
The July 16, 2004 brief and its attachments, in which the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the
Commission”) filed before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter
“the Court”) a request for provisional measures, pursuant to Articles 63(2) of the
American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the
American Convention”), 25 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the
Rules of Procedure”) and 74 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, “for their
urgent adoption,” to ensure that the State of Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela) (hereinafter “the State” or “Venezuela”) “protect[s] the lives, safety, and
freedom of expression of the journalists, management, and other employees of
[Venezuelan television station] Globovisión [(hereinafter “Globovisión”)] who are at
the facilities [of said] social communications broadcaster [...] or who are associated
with the journalistic operation of said broadcaster”. The Commission also asked the
Court to order the State to take such steps as may be necessary to protect the
perimeter of the head office of Globovisión channel.
2.
The grounds stated by the Commission in its request for provisional measures
(supra Having Seen 1), summarized as follows:
a)
on January 20, 2002 Mayela León Rodríguez, Jorge Manuel Paz and
María Fernanda Flores, employees of Globovisión, and other employees of
Radio Caracas Televisión (hereinafter “RCTV”), were attacked by a group of
approximately 50 persons while they were covering transmission of the “Aló
Presidente” program;
b)
on January 30, 2002 the Commission adopted precautionary measures
in favor of the aforementioned employees of Globovisión and other employees
of RCTV. In said measures, the Commission asked the State to abstain from
“all [...] intimidating actions regarding the practice of their profession by the
journalists and other employees of the [aforementioned] braodcaster;”
c)
during 2002 the Commission asked the State to adopt precautionary
measures and extended them in 2003 and 2004 with the aim of protecting
the lives, safety, and freedom of expression of “cameramen, management,
photographers, and facilities of the media attacked”, including Globovisión;
d)
on July 9, 2002 a low-power device exploded in Globovisión’s facilities
in la Florida, to the northeast of Caracas;
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents