4 and that, although the Community had received the payment for interest on arrears, the State had not formally informed the Community of how the interest had been calculated, so that it was not possible to verify this, and (d) that the payment of legal costs was complied with by Nicaragua on April 16, 2002. The representatives submitted a brief requesting additional reparations and also a supplementary brief for additional reparations in which they alleged that, by not complying with the fourth operative paragraph of the judgment, the State had caused various pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages to the members of the Community. Consequently, they requested the Court to order the State to pay compensation for this concept, as well as for costs and expenses. Lastly, they requested the Court to order that a public hearing be held. 10. That, now that seven years have elapsed since the said Judgment, the Court requires updated and detailed information on the measures adopted by the State to comply with its rulings, so that it can assess the effective implementation and verify whether the judgment has been complied with. Consequently, the State must prove to the Inter-American Court that is has fulfilled its obligations under the third, fourth, sixth and seventh operative paragraphs of the judgment with due diligence. 11. That, in view of the above, the Court finds it necessary for the State to present detailed and updated information on: (a) Its obligation to “adopt in its domestic law, pursuant to Article 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, the legislative, administrative, and any other measures necessary to create an effective mechanism for the delimitation, demarcation, and titling of the property of the indigenous communities, in accordance with their customary law, values, customs and mores” (third operative paragraph of the judgment of August 31, 2001). In this regard, the Court requires information on the progress made in complying with this obligation; and on why Act No. 445, entitled Act concerning the Communal Property Regime of the Indigenous Peoples and Ethnic Communities of the Autonomous Regions of the Atlantic Coast and of the Coco, Bocay, Indio and Maiz Rivers is an effective mechanism for the delimitation, demarcation and titling of the properties of the indigenous communities, in accordance with their customary law, values, customs and mores, including the corresponding supporting documentation; (b) Its obligation to “carry out the delimitation, demarcation, and titling of the lands of the members of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community and, until that delimitation, demarcation and titling has been done, abstain from any acts that might lead State agents, or third parties acting with its acquiescence or its tolerance, to affect the existence, value, use or enjoyment of the property located in the geographic area where the members of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community live and carry out their activities” (fourth operative paragraph of the judgment of August 31, 2001). In this regard, the Court requires information on the specific measures taken by the State to fulfill this aspect and the progress made in complying with this obligation, including the supporting documentation corresponding to: (i) The submission of the case of the Awas Tingni Community for the delimitation, demarcation and titling of their land under the Act No. 445