i) Request to incorporate documents by the State and the representatives 36. In its brief containing pleadings and motions, the representatives asked the Court, based on Article 58(b) of the Rules of Procedure, to require several documents from the State as evidence to resolve the issues to be included in the case file of this case. The State and the Commission had no observations regarding this request. 37. The President considers it relevant to require the State to present: a) the official certificate of death and/or act of removal of the body of Mr. Rodolfo (or Rodulfo) Carrillo Mora; b) complete and accurate information in the hands of State agencies, including the municipal government of Tame, the National Statistics Department DANE (for its acronym in Spanish), the municipal public service companies, the Colombian Institute for Family Wellbeing ICBF (for its acronym in Spanish) health centers and public education establishments, on the population that resided in Santo Domingo on December 13, 1998; c) complete and accurate information from the records of the Social Solidarity Network, regarding the population registered as displaced from Santo Domingo (municipality of Tame) in relation to the facts of December 13, 1998; d) copy of the signed contracts between the Cravo Norte Association and the company Airscan International Inc., and certification of the contractual relationship between this company and Messers. Joe Orta, Charlie Denny, and Dan Mcclintock; e) complete, current, and accurate information on the deprivation of liberty measures against Cesar Romero Pradilla, Johan Jimenez Valencia, and Héctor Mario Hernández, including if at a point in time they were deprived of liberty, and if so, the places they were detained, the conditions of their detention, and the time they were effectively deprived of their liberty. The parties and the Commission may refer to this documentation in their final arguments, if they consider it necessary. 38. On the other hand, in its answer, the State requested that the Court: “1. […] officiate the Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia to issue a copy of every criminal proceeding carried out for the facts that occurred on December 13, 1998, in Santo Domingo, against the pilots. 2. […] if it considers it necessary to procure the certified copies of the documents that the Colombian State presents as evidence and that are in the case file of the criminal proceeding carried out against the aircraft crew UH1H, to then officiate the Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia to send the certified copy of these procedural documents, just as the State of Colombia did on January 31, 2012,” and “3. […] if it is considered necessary to have certified copies of the proceedings carried out before the Attorney General of the Nation and the State Council, to officiate these agencies to provide such procedural work.” 39. The Commission and the representatives did not provide observations in this regard. The President considers that, at the opportune time, the Court will render a decision on the relevance of requiring the mentioned documentation from the State. THEREFORE: THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Pursuant to Articles 24(1) and 25(2) of the Statute of the Court and Articles 4, 15(1), 26(1), 31(2), 45, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, and 60 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, DECIDES TO: 1. Require, for the reasons stated in this Order, pursuant to the principle of judicial 10