76 329. With respect to this group of victims, however, the Commission does not have specific information regarding the relationship of these reparations with the totality of the facts and violations declared in the present case. If these reparations were actually delivered by the NPR, the Commission will examine the link between the established facts and violations of the report, and assess its value, its suitability, and sufficiency in light of the Inter-American reparations standards411. V. CONCLUSIONS 330. Based on the considerations of fact and of law contained in the present report, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights concludes that the Guatemalan State is responsible for violation of the rights protected under articles 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 of the American Convention, read in conjunction with the obligations established in article 1(1) thereof; Article I of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, and Article 7 of the Convention of Belém do Pará. 331. Based on the foregoing conclusions, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS RECOMMENDS THAT THE GUATEMALAN STATE 1. Make adequate reparations for the individual and collective human rights violations stated in this report taking into account the material, moral and cultural aspects, including fair reparations, the establishment and dissemination of the true historic facts, the revival of the memory of the deceased and missing victims, the implementation of a psychosocial program that pays attention to the particular needs of the survivors and those of the families of the deceased and missing victims. The collective reparations must be implemented with the consent of the survivors of the Chichupac village and its neighboring communities with the aim of reestablishing their community life as members of the Maya Achi indigenous people, and in particular, their special bond with their lands. 2. Establish a mechanism to identify as many of the victims executed in the present case and provide whatever is needed to continue the identification process and return the victims’ mortal remains. 3. Establish a mechanism to determine who the disappeared persons in the massacres were and the survivors. 4. Locate the disappeared victims’ mortal remains and restore them to their next of kin. 5. Establish a mechanism to facilitate full identification of the next of kin of the victims who were executed and disappeared, so that they may claim the reparations to which they are entitled. 411 The I/A Court H.R has previously stated that “If the State has paid compensation to the victims [...], it may deduct the amounts that have been paid for the violations established in this Judgment when paying the reparations ordered. At the stage of monitoring compliance with judgment, the State must prove that, under this program”. I/A Court H.R., Case of Gudiel Álvarez et al. (Diario Militar) v. Guatemala. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 20, 2012. Series C No. 253, par. 389.