CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

obligations emanating from the exclusionary rule. Additionally, to strengthen the accountability mechanisms for the officials responsible for the treatment of persons deprived of liberty. Firmado en el original Mario Lopez-Garelli Por autorización del Secretario Ejecutivo 53

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
11Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I. SYNOPSIS 1
II. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION1
III. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES 2
A. The Petitioner2
B. The State 4
IV. ANALYSIS OF COMPETENCE AND ADMISSIBILITY 5
A. Competence of the Commission ratione personae, ratione loci, ratione temporis and ratione materiae5
B. Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies 5
1. Arrests of the alleged victims and their pretrial detention 6
2. Purported torture, beating and mistreatment of the four alleged victims by Interpol agents of Pichincha and purported failure to investigate 7
3. Alleged violations of the right to a fair trial and judicial protection throughout their criminal proceedings 8
C. Timeliness of the Petition 9
D. Duplication of International Proceedings and Res Judicata10
E. Colorable Claim 10
V. PROVEN FACTS 10
A. Police Investigation into Operation “Linda"10
B. Detention of the alleged victims and the initial statements at the Interpol Offices of Pichincha 11
C. Medical Examinations Reports of August 9, 1994 18
D. Criminal proceedings against the alleged victims20
E . Hábeas corpus Relief sought by Eusebio Domingo Revelles with regard to pretrial custody 25
V. LEGAL ANALYSIS 26
A. Deprivation of liberty of the alleged victims and remedies pursued by Mr. Eusebio Domingo Revelles in order to regain his liberty .27
1. Right not to be unlawfully deprived of liberty 27
2. Pretrial detention30
3. Judicial Control over the Detention of the Alleged Victims 34
4. Right to recourse to contest the detention 35
B. Acts alleged to be violations of the right to humane treatment and the investigations in to these acts37
1. Allegation of torture and violations of the personal integrity of the alleged victims37
2. Investigations conducted into these acts 39
C. Criminal Proceedings against Mr. Eusebio Domingo Revelles41
1. Rule on the exclusion of evidence obtained through coercion42
2. Right to a Defense 44
3. Right to Information on Consular Assistance 46
4. Principle of the Presumption of Innocence 47
5. Reasonable period of time for the criminal proceedings 50
VI. CONCLUSIONS52
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS 52

Herrera Espinoza y otros. Report Nº 40/14

Admissibility and Merits Report

Preview

Country

Ecuador

Mechanism

Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Date: Jul 17, 2014

Multi Select

Felipe González
James Cavallaro
José Jesús Orozco Henríquez
Paulo Vanucchi
Rosa María Ortíz
Rose-Marie Belle Antoine
Tracy Robinson

Primary Documents

Herrera Espinoza y otros. Report Nº 40_14.pdf
English
Download View
Herrera Espinoza y otros. Informe Nº 40_14.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Herrera Espinoza y otros. Report Nº 40_14.docx242.59 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Multi Select7
- Judge and/or Commissioners7
No Label1
- Case1
IACHR documents1
- Letter of Submission to the IACourt1
País1
- Country1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.