50 (a) for each of the eight deceased victims, whose right to life was declared violated and who are listed in Annex B(2) of this judgment, USD 80,000.00 (eighty thousand United States dollars); (b) for each of the three deceased victims who were children, whose right to life was declared declared violated and who are listed in Annex B(4) of this judgement, USD 90,000.00 (ninety thousand United States dollars); (c) for each of the 29 injured victims, whose right to personal integrity was declared violated and who are listed in Annex B(3) of this judgment, USD 20,000.00 (twenty thousand United States dollars); (d) for each of the next of kin of the 10 deceased persons, who are indicated in (a) and (b) above and are listed in Annex B(5) of this judgment, USD 10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars)237 and (e) for each of the persons whose only rights to be declared violated were judicial guarantees and judicial protection, USD 5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars). Those persons are: 1.-Manuela Pop Choc; 2.-Francisco Quip Choc; 3.-Petrona Quip Pop; 4.-Margarita Quip Pop; 5.-Martín Maquín Quip Pop; 6.-Dominga Maquín Pop; 7.Santiago Quip Pop; 8.-José Morales Ortiz; 9.-Cruz Maldonado Silvestre; 10. Martalia Hernández Maldonado; 11.-Andrés Hernández Maldonado, 12.-Florencia Hernández Maldonado. The amounts ordered for the persons who are deceased at the time of the delivery of this judgment should be paid to their next of kin in the period established in paragraph 196 of this judgment, in accordance with the criteria found in its paragraph 186.238 F. Costs and Expenses 191. The representative requested, in its brief with pleadings and motions, an amount of GTQ 1,500,000.00. Later, in its final written arguments, it requested an amount of USD 136,425.65 for expenses incurred “over the years” that “not all can be documented.” 192. The State requested that the Court, with respect to the reimbursement of costs and expenses, grant only those that have been duly proven before the Court. 193. The Court reiterates that, in accordance with its case law, 239 costs and expenses form part of the concept of reparation as long as the activities deployed by the victims to obtain justice, at both the domestic and international levels, entail disbursements that must be compensated when the international responsibility of the State has been declared Reference is made to the next of kin of 10 deceased victims, since there is no indication of the next of kin of the young boy Santiago Coc. 238 It should be clarified that what has been stated regarding payment to the next of kin of the deceased persons is applicable to any of the victims who are deceased when this judgment is delivered, even though the death is not indicated in the judgment. It is also clarified that the victims listed in Annexes B(3) and B(5) of this judgment should receive the declared compensation for non-pecuniary damages due to the injured victims and also the declared compensation for non-pecuniary damages due to the next of kin of the deceased persons. 239 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and Costs, supra, para. 42 and Case of Amrhein et al. v. Costa Rica, supra, para.494. 237