146. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to publish the Judgment in its entirety in three newspapers with wide circulation in the country, in the Official Gazette of Guatemala, and to prepare and publish a pamphlet summarizing the Court's decision, and to publish it on the State's official website for a period of one year. 147. The State argued that, if the Court were to sentence it, this would be a violation of the Convention, since it manifested its good faith in the negotiation for the signing of a friendly settlement agreement. 148. The Commission did not take a position on this allegation. 149. The Court orders, as it has done in other cases,188 that the State publish, within six months of notification of this Judgment: a) the official summary of this Judgment prepared by the Court, once only, in a newspaper of wide national circulation and in the official gazette in a legible and appropriate font size, and b) this Judgment, in its entirety, available for at least one year, on an official website. The State shall immediately inform this Court once it proceeds with each of the ordered publications, regardless of the one-year period for submitting its first report provided for in operative paragraph 9 of this Judgment. (ii) Public act of acknowledgement of international responsibility 150. The representatives requested that the State be ordered to carry out an act of acknowledgement of international responsibility and public apology through the Judicial Authority and the Ministry of Justice. 151. The State argued that it will not proceed with the public act or the placement of the plaque, since it has not incurred international responsibility. 152. The Commission did not take a position on this allegation. 153. The Court considers that the issuance of this Judgment and the reparations ordered therein are sufficient and adequate. b.3 Guarantees of non-repetition 154. The representatives requested that the State be ordered to bring prison conditions into line with international human rights standards, guaranteeing medical and sanitary care, better health conditions, a visiting regime, adequate physical space to house individuals deprived of their liberty with sanitary services and showers in good working order, access to sunlight and fresh air. 155. The State alleged that it has made and continues to make its best efforts to the best of its ability to readapt prisons in compliance with international standards. 156. The Commission did not take a position on this allegation. 157. The Court observes that in the case of Fermín Ramírez v. Guatemala, the State was ordered to "adopt, within a reasonable period of time, the measures necessary so that the conditions of the prisons adjust to the international norms of human rights".189 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Martínez Coronado v. Guatemala, supra, para. 98. 189 Cf. Case of Fermín Ramírez v. Guatemala, supra, operative paragraph 12. 188 41