ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JULY 1, 2011 CASE OF GARCÍA ASTO AND RAMÍREZ ROJAS v. PERU * MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The judgment on merits, reparations and costs delivered on November 25, 2005 (hereinafter “the judgment”), by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”), in which the Court established that the State must: 11. […] provide free medical and psychological care to Wilson García Asto through its health care services, including the provision of medicines free of charge, as set forth in paragraph 280 of th[e] judgment. 12. […] provide Wilson García Asto and Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas with the opportunity for training and professional development through study grants, as set forth in paragraph 281 of th[e] judgment. 13. […] pay Wilson García Asto and Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas, within one year, the compensation for pecuniary damage specified in paragraphs 261, 262 and 263 of th[e] judgment, as set forth in paragraphs 288, 291, 292, 294 and 295 [t]hereof. 14. […] pay Wilson García Asto and Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas, Napoleón García Tuesta, Celia Asto-Urbano, Elisa García Asto, Gustavo García, María Alejandra Rojas, Marcos Ramírez Álvarez and Santa, Pedro, Filomena, Julio, Obdulia, Marcelino, and Adela Ramírez Rojas, within one year, the compensation for non-pecuniary damage specified in paragraphs 270, 271, 273 and 275 of th[e] judgment, as set forth in paragraphs 255, 288, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294 and 295 [t]hereof. 15. […] pay, within one year, the amount awarded for costs and expenses incurred in the domestic proceedings and in the international proceedings before the inter-American system for the protection of human rights, pursuant to paragraph 287 of th[e] judgment, which shall be delivered to Wilson García Asto and Urcesino Ramírez Rojas, as set forth in paragraphs 289, 291, 292, 294 and 295 [t]hereof. 16. […] publish in the Official Gazette and in another national newspaper, once, within six months, the chapter entitled Proven Facts, without the footnotes, and the operative paragraphs of th[e] judgment, as set forth in paragraph 282 [t]hereof. 2. The Order of the Inter-American Court on monitoring compliance with judgment of July 12, 2007, in which the Court found it essential that the State present additional updated information on the said rulings (supra having seen paragraph 1). 3. The communications of the State of Peru (hereinafter “the State,” “the Peruvian State” or “Peru”) of October 5, 2007, and April 17, 2009, in which it referred to compliance with the judgment. * Judge Alberto Pérez Pérez was unable to attend the ninety-first regular session for reasons beyond his control and, consequently, did not take part in the deliberation and signature of this order. Judge Diego GarcíaSayán, a Peruvian national, recused himself from hearing this case in keeping with Articles 19(2) of the Court’s Statute and 19 of its Rules of Procedure.