October 21, 2016, the judge hearing the appeal denied the revocation and remitted it to the Appeals Tribunal.188 On March 8, 2017, the Tribunal confirmed the appealed decision and ordered that the matter be returned to the lower court.189 162. The accused then filed, on April 3, 2017, both an appeal in cassation and objection of unconstitutionality against Law 18,831 to the Supreme Court.190 December 20, 2017, the Supreme Court partially accepted the objection with indication that Articles 2 and 3 of Law 18,831 were not applicable to the accused.191 May 23, 2018, the Supreme Court declared the appeal in cassation inadmissible.192 an On an On 163. On November 12, 2018, E.K. presented an objection of unconstitutionality with respect to Articles 1, 2, and 3 of Law 19,550,193 The proceedings were suspended and were sent to the Supreme Court.194 They were then remitted between December 3, 2018 and April 3, 2019, from the Fourth Criminal Prosecutor to the Court Prosecutor, the Prosecutor General and the Special Prosecutor.195 On August 29, 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed the objection of unconstitutionality.196 164. On October 23, 2019, the defense of E.K. again requested that the proceedings be closed and archived due to prescription.197 The Special Prosecutor, on October 29, 2019, labeled the request a delaying tactic and asked that the accused be “urgently” summoned to testify.198 On November 1, 2019, the court rejected the request to close Cf. Decree 2333/2016 of the acting judge, of October 21, 2016 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, f. 6446). 188 Cf. Judgment 32 of the Second Tribunal of Criminal Appeals, of March 8, 2017 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 6459 to 6464). 189 Cf. Filing of an appeal in cassation and an objection of unconstitutionality, presented by the defense of the accused on April 3, 2017 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 6468 to 6511). 190 Cf. Judgment 1984 of the Supreme Court of December 20, 2017, in cases “Reyes, Arturo Ricardo – Odizzio Di Raggio, Marta – Potasnik, Flora – Complaint – Objection of unconstitutionality – Law No. 18.831 and criminal cassation” (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 6608 and 6609). 191 Cf. Judgment 1300 of the Supreme Court of May 23, 2018, in cases “Reyes, Arturo Ricardo – Odizzio Di Raggio, Marta – Potasnik, Flora – Complaint – Objection of unconstitutionality – Law No. 18.831 and criminal cassation” (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 6620 to 6623). 192 Cf. Filing of an objection of unconstitutionality, presented by E.K. on November 12, 2018 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 6686 to 6706). 193 Cf. Decree 2487/2018 of the acting judge, of November 13, 2018 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, f. 6707). 194 Cf. Opinion outside the hearing No. 5844/18/FPM4, of the Fourth Criminal Prosecutor, of December 3, 2018; brief of the Court Prosecutor and Prosecutor General of February 5, 2019 and brief of the Special Prosecutor of April 3, 2019 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 6722 to 6726, 6733 to 6758, and 6781 to 6794, respectively). It is important to note that the transfer to the Special Prosecutor took place after March 14, 2019, after which it was sent Fourth Criminal Prosecutor and to the Court Prosecutor and the Prosecutor General (cf. Order of the Supreme Court of March 14, 2019 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, folio. 6768)). 195 Cf. Judgment 1278 of the Supreme Court of August 29, 2019 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 7054 to 7055). 196 Cf. Brief of the defense of the accused requesting “the closing and archiving due to prescription,” of October 23, 2019 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 7092 to 7095). 197 Cf. Brief of the Special Prosecutor, No. 338, of October 29, 2019 (evidence file, files remitted by the State, fs. 7098 and 7099). 198 44