5 newspaper, the relevant parts of the Judgment (operative paragraph nine of the Judgment), the State reported that the Specialized Supranational Public Prosecutor, through an official letter sent on March 23, 2010, requested that the Secretary General of the Ministry of Justice "publish the relevant parts of the Judgment." Also, through an official letter sent on May 17, 2010, the aforementioned Prosecutor requested that the General Director of the Office of Administration, among others, "publish the relevant parts of the Judgment." 15. The representatives noted that the aforementioned letters referred to by the State "shows that the State has recently requested the necessary actions to carry out the publication of the Judgment in a nationally circulated newspaper," and that to date "it ha[s] not been possible to confirm whether said publication was completed." 16. The Commission noted that "having gone over the deadline stipulated by the Court, it has not fully complied with this reparation measure." 17. Given the State did not submit information demonstrating compliance with this point, the President-in-Office deems it appropriate that the State report on concrete measures aimed at achieving full and effective compliance with this reparation measure. a) Regarding operative paragraph ten of the Judgment 18. Regarding the obligation to provide free medical and psychological treatment, without any charge and through its specialized health institutions, to Victoria Margarita Palomino Buitrón, Esmila Liliana Conislla Cárdenas, María Dolores Gómez Palomino, Luzmila Sotelo Palomino, Emiliano Palomino Buitrón, Mónica Palomino Buitrón, Rosa Palomino Buitrón Margarita Palomino Buitrón, and the girl Ana María Gómez Guevara (operative paragraph ten of the Judgment), whereby the Specialized Supranational Public Prosecutor requested that that the Health Ministry for the Nacional Council of Human Rights, inter alia, order "the necessary actions to address the present case and to submit a report on [its] compliance." 19. The representatives noted that the information submitted by the State shows a request made to the health sector, which was not repeated during 2009 and 2010. They also noted that "the State has not proven that the next-of-kin of Santiago Gómez Palomino are affiliated with the SIS [Comprehensive Health Insurance] and are receiving health benefits provided by this insurance." 20. The Commission reiterated that the information provided by the State did not include "specific points that make it possible to assess if the State is compliant with the provision for appropriate treatment to help to effectively improve the health conditions of the beneficiaries," and considered it essential that information be presented regarding the treatment as well as the measures that are planned for adoption to continue the health treatment. 21. The President-in-Office believes that on this point the State has not submitted sufficient information to enable the Court to assess the degree of compliance with the Judgment, thus it is necessary to request further information from the State regarding the effective compliance with the obligation to provide the necessary medical and psychological treatment to all victims, through its specialized health institutions, and for as long as necessary. In particular, it should report on the state of the procedure to join the Integral Health Insurance (SIS) for the next-of-kin of