19 108. That same day, July 2, 1991, one of the patrols reached the Pallcca-Pampa, Huaraco Pata, Rodeo Pampa sector of the community of Santa Barbara and, after ruining the peasants’ food supplies, assembled all the 19 villagers and accused them of being terrorists. 109. The “Escorpio” patrol, commanded by Infantry Lieutenant Bendezú Vargas, reached the Rodeo 20 Pampa area of Santa Barbara campesino community on July 4, 1991, accompanied by a number of civilians. The soldiers raided the homes of Francisco Hilario Torres and Ramón Hilario Morán, both of which are situated in the Laccaypampa area of the Rodeo Pampa sector, and, after causing damages and appropriating the animals and other property, detained and took away everyone inside the homes accusing them of having family members who would belong to Shining Path under their perception: Francisco Hilario Torres (age 60 years); his wife, Dionicia Quispe Mallqui (age 57 years); his daughters, Antonia Hilario Quispe (age 31 years) and Magdalena Hilario Quispe (age 26 years); his daughter-in-law Mercedes Carhuapoma de la Cruz (age 20 years); and his grandchildren, Yessenia (age 6 years), Miriam (age 3 years), and Edith Osnayo Hilario (age 8 months); Wilmer Hilario Carhuapoma (age 3 years); Alex Jorge Hilario (age 6 years); and Ramón Hilario Morán (age 26 years); his wife, Dionicia Guillén 21 (age 24 years), and their sons Raúl Hilario Guillén (age 18 months) and Héctor Hilario Guillén (age 6 years). 110. In addition, on July 4, 1991, Mr. Alejandro Huamaní Robles was on his way to Acobamba with his son, Elihoref Huamaní Vergara, who had recently been discharged from the Army (he had served in that institution 22 from 1988 to 1990), and his grandson Elias Pumacahua Huamaní, age 12. They had traveled two kilometers from his ranch, “Uña Corral”, in the community of Santa Barbara, when they met an army patrol composed of 15 23 soldiers, who detained Elihoref Huamaní, without even asking for his identity papers and forced Alejandro 24 Huamaní Robles and his grandson to accompany them. As they were walking, the military patrol encountered two other groups of soldiers, the second of which had with them a group of detained civilians with a large number 25 of animals. Shortly afterwards, Alejandro Huamaní and his grandson were released, while Elihoref Huamaní went 26 on with the military patrol. Elihoref’s father did not express any undue concern at his son's detention at the time 19 Appendix 2. Official letter No. 20 CCSB-91 of July 3, 1991, sent by the elders of Santa Barbara campesino community to the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention. Appendix 1 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 20 Appendix 1. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Peru. Volume VII. Chapter 2: Cases Investigated by the CVR 2.50. The Extrajudicial Executions in Santa Barbara. Campesinos accused of being terrorists detained. 21 Appendix 3. Complaint of Nicolás Hilario Morán, President of Santa Barbara Campesino Community, presented on July 16, 1991, to the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman. Appendix 13 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992; Appendix 4. Record of the complaint of Zósimo Hilario Quispe presented on July 8, 1991, to the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention. Appendix 9 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992; Appendix 5. Petitioners’ brief of October 5, 2010. List of victims and their next-of-kin 22 Appendix 6. Record of the complaint presented by Alejandro Huamaní Robles on July 15, 1991, to the Office of the Huancavelica Special Prosecutor for Crime Prevention. Appendix 14 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1991; Appendix 7. Record of the verbal complaint presented by Alejandro Huamaní Robles on July 23, 1991, to the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman. Appendix 15 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 23 Appendix 5. Complaint presented by Alejandro Huamaní Robles on July 18, 1991, to the Office of the Huancavelica Senior Superior Court Prosecutor. Appendix 22 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 24 Appendix 7. Record of the verbal complaint presented by Alejandro Huamaní Robles on July 23, 1991, to the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman. Appendix 15 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 25 Appendix 7. Record of the verbal complaint presented by Alejandro Huamaní Robles on July 23, 1991, to the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman. Appendix 15 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992. 26 Appendix 7. Record of the verbal complaint presented by Alejandro Huamaní Robles on July 23, 1991, to the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman. Appendix 15 to the petitioners’ brief of February 20, 1992.