25 police station two or three times, knowing all the while that they were surreptitiously watching me; I helped the person in custody with his police statement. Everything I did was above board. Then, two days later I returned to Lima for family and professional reasons. I did not continue to advise this individual, but returned to this city after ten or twelve days. I no longer assisted this individual with his defense. However, 71 at the request of his mother, I was present for the search of his residence. 112. Three congressmen, among them Deputy Roger Cáceres Velázquez, twice traveled to Huánuco where they attempted to speak with Mr. Galindo while he was being held at the Military Barracks; however, they were not permitted to speak with him on the pretext that the only person who could authorize such a visit was the 72 highest ranking military official there, who had not been in Huánuco for several days. 113. On November 9, 1994, Luis Antonio Galindo Cárdenas received a visit from representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross at the Huánuco Military Base. The record made on that occasion stated 73 that Mr. Galindo had been detained since October 16, 1994. Application of the Repentance Law while the alleged victim was under arrest 114. On October 29, 1994, the “Amplified Declaration from Applicant” code number A1J054967 was taken in the offices of DECOTE-PNP-Hco. Present for the occasion was the representative from the Public 74 Prosecutor’s Office, Dr. Ricardo Robles y Coz, and a PNP officer. The text of the Declaration states that the applicant pointed out that he was unaware of “the structure of the organs created by the PCP-SL” but that he had learned “through media reports –both verbal and written-about the work done by the ‘Democratic Lawyers’ to defend the terrorists, as these attorneys dedicated themselves to fervently defending the subversive elements 75 associated with the Sendero Luminoso.” When asked whether he could identify the roles performed by the PILCO PACO terrorist criminals known as (c) “Guillermo”, Noemí Huaccha Sánchez (c) “Yersi”, and the wife of “Guillermo” known as (c) “Lida”, he said the following: “That he knew that they belonged to the sinister organization known as Sendero Luminoso, because they said as much; however, they didn’t specify either their 76 position or rank within that organization.” When asked which subversive groups linked to the PCP-SL movement of popular artists (MAP) he had advised, he answered as follows: “He had partially advised Fernando Salinas Solórzano, who was linked to the group whose façade was “Semilla Amor,” according to the police accusation that was part of a criminal case brought in the courts; he clarified that “my advisory services were confined to the 77 police stage of the proceedings.” 71 Annex 11. Public Prosecutor’s Office-Office of the Attorney General of the Nation, April 26, 1994 Statement signed by Attorney General Blanca Nélida Colan Maguiño. Attachment to the petitioner’s brief of January 3, 1996. 72 Annex 13. Testimony of Dr.Roger Cáceres Velázquez, Attachment to the petitioner’s brief of November 3, 2008, not refuted by the State. 73 Annex 14. Certification by the International Committee of the Red Cross, dated March 15, 2004. Attachment to the petitioner’s brief of November 3, 2008. 74 Annex 33. Amplified Declaration from the Applicant, dated October 29, 1994. Signed by the police authority (identified by name and signature), the representative of the Public Prosecutor’s Office (identified by name and signature), and the applicant (identified by a signature). Attachment to the State’s brief of October 17, 2008. 75 Annex 33. Amplified Declaration from the Applicant, dated October 29, 1994. Signed by the police authority (identified by name and signature), the representative of the Public Prosecutor’s Office (identified by name and signature), and the applicant (identified by a signature). Attachment to the State’s brief of October 17, 2008. 76 Annex 33. Amplified Declaration from the Applicant, dated October 29, 1994. Signed by the police authority (identified by name and signature), the representative of the Public Prosecutor’s Office (identified by name and signature), and the applicant (identified by a signature). Attachment to the State’s brief of October 17, 2008. 77 Annex 33. Amplified Declaration from the Applicant, dated October 29, 1994. Signed by the police authority (identified by name and signature), the representative of the Public Prosecutor’s Office (identified by name and signature), and the applicant (identified by a signature). Attachment to the State’s brief of October 17, 2008. Anexo 33.