CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

68 I/A Court HR. Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of August 31, 2017. Roberto F. Caldas President Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Eduardo Vio Grossi Humberto A. Sierra Porto Elizabeth Odio Benito Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Roberto F. Caldas President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
17Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION6
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS7
A. Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives7
B. Considerations of the Court8
1.Inclusion of Article16 of the Conventionin theMerits Report9
2. Temporal delimitation of the analysis of judicial actions10
V EVIDENCE11
A. Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence11
B. Admission of the evidence11
1. Admission of the documentary evidence11
2. Admission of the testimonial and expert evidence11
C. Assessment of the evidence12
VI FACTS13
A. The Industrial Communities in Peru13
B. Background, functions and responsibilities of Mr. Lagos del Campo as president of the Electoral Committee of the Industrial Community16
C. The dismissal of Mr. Lagos del Campo and the applicable legal framework17
D. Actions filed by Mr. Lagos del Campo21
1. Application for review of dismissal21
2. Application for amparo and nullity22
3. Application for amparo before the Constitutional Court23
E. The situation of Mr. Lagos del Campo after his dismissal25
VII MERITS25
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission27
1. Freedom of expression and the right to a fair trial27
2. Freedom of association28
3. Domestic legal effects29
B. Considerations of the Court29
1. Freedom of expression and judicial guarantees29
1.1 Freedom of expression in labor contexts30
1.2 Analysis of the necessity and reasonableness of the restriction in this case32
2. Violation of job security41
2.1 Arguments on labor rights41
2.2 The right to job security as a protected right44
3. Violations of freedom of association49
4. Domestic legal effects52
5. General conclusion52
VII-2 ACCESS TO JUSTICE (ARTICLES 8 AND 25 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTIONA)52
A. Arguments of the parties and of the Commission52
B. Considerations of the Court53
1. Access to justice to protect job security as a right recognized in the Constitution54
2. Conclusion58
VIII REPARATIONS (APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 63(1) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)58
A. Injured party59
B. Measures of satisfaction59
C. Other measures requested59
D. Compensation61
1. Pecuniary damage61
2. Non-pecuniary damage62
E. Costs and expenses63
F. Reimbursement of expenditure to the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund64
G. Method of complying with the payments ordered65
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS65
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CALDAS69
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FERRER MAC-GREGOR POISOT75
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VIO GROSS92
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIERRA PORTO109

Lagos del Campo. Judgment. August 31, 2017

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Aug 31, 2017

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C 340

Country

Peru

Signatories

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Elizabeth Odio Benito
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Leoncio Patricio Pazmiño Freire
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas

Primary Documents

Lagos del Campo. Judgment. August 31, 2017.pdf
English
Download View
Lagos del Campo. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 31 de agosto de 2017.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Lagos del Campo. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 31 de agosto de 2017.docx487.62 kB

Lagos del Campo. Judgment. August 31, 2017.docx401.98 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Separate Votes4
- Separate vote4
Signatories3
- Judge and/or Commissioners3
País1
- Country1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
IACourt Documents7
- IACourt judgment1
- Order of the President IACHR2
- Order of the IACourt3
- Hearing1
No Label1
- Case1

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.