The amounts allocated in this agreement as compensation shall be paid in full to the persons indicated, in accordance with the provisions of this agreement, without deductions. In the event that the State should default or fail to make the agreed payments, the parties shall request the Court to rule thereon. 129. With respect to the foregoing, and considering the circumstances of this case, the Court deems it particularly important to ensure the timely payment of compensatory damages to mitigate the pecuniary consequences and the profound suffering that the violations caused the victims in various aspects of their lives, particularly to their integrity, family life and work. The Court also considers it appropriate to endorse the provisions of the agreement regarding the obligation of the parties to “keep the amounts specified strictly confidential” and has therefore omitted to transcribe these in the publication of this judgment. B.3. Payment of costs and expenses 130. In the friendly settlement agreement, the parties requested that the Court determine, in equity, the amounts for costs and expenses to be paid by the State to AMHBLI, in full and without deductions. CEJIL waived the amounts that would correspond to it in order to “contribute to the present process.” 131. In this regard, the Court recalls that costs and expenses form part the concept of reparation, because the efforts made by the victims to obtain justice, both at the national and international levels, entail disbursements that must be compensated when the international responsibility of the State is declared in a condemnatory judgment. With regard to the reimbursement of costs and expenses, it is for the Court to prudently assess their scope, which includes the expenses incurred before the authorities of the domestic courts and those generated during the proceedings before the inter-American system, taking into account the circumstances of the specific case and the nature of the international jurisdiction for the protection of human rights. This assessment may be based on the principle of equity, taking into account the expenses indicated by the parties, provided that their quantum is reasonable. 155 132. In view of the agreement reached between the State and the representatives, the Court deems it reasonable to set a total sum of [the amount of money agreed by the parties and established in the agreement] as payment for costs and expenses. Said amount shall be delivered, within six months from notification of this judgment, to the Association of Disabled Honduran Miskito Divers (AMHBLI). In the process of monitoring compliance with this judgment, the Court may order the State to reimburse the victims or their representatives for any reasonable expenses, duly proven, incurred during that procedural stage. 156 C. Guarantees of non-repetition C.1. Inclusion of Miskito divers and their families in existing social programs 133. In the friendly settlement agreement, the State agreed to the following: Cf. Case of Garrido and Baigorria v. Argentina. Reparations and costs. Judgment of August 27, 1998. Series C No. 39, para. 82, and Case of Vicky Hernández et al. v. Honduras. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 26, 2021. Series C No. 422, para. 195. 155 156 Cf. Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña v. Bolivia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 1, 2010. Series C No. 217, para. 29, and Case Grijalva Bueno v. Ecuador. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of June 3, 2021. Series C No. 426, para. 195. 45