relevant, during consideration of the merits of the case, in order to
determine whether they constitute violations of the American Convention.
2.
Timeliness of presentation
49.
Article 46(1)(b) of the Convention stipulates that, to be found
admissible, the petition must be lodged within a period of six months
from the date on which the party alleging violation of his rights was
notified of the final judgment at the domestic level. However, according
to Article 46(2) of the Convention and Article 32(2) of the Commission’s
Rules of Procedure, “the rule does not apply when it has been
impossible to exhaust internal remedies due to a lack of due process,
denial of access to remedies, or unwarranted delay in issuing a final
decision […]. Nor does this rule apply where the allegations concern a
continuing situation--where the rights of the victim are allegedly
affected on an ongoing basis.” 6
50.
In the case at hand, the Commission notes that the complaint
was submitted prior to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice on
the application for conditional release of Mr. Jenkins, dated September
25, 1997; prior to the judgment of the Second National Criminal and
Correctional Court of the Federal Capital dismissing the complaint laid by
the Sixth Oral Tribunal of the Federal Criminal Court against the
prosecutors who used falsified evidence against the petitioner, dated
April 20, 1998; and prior to the resolution of the Prosecutor General to
suspend administrative proceedings against those prosecution officials,
dated September 6, 1999, actions that effectively brought to a close the
remedies available within domestic jurisdiction. Consequently, the
requirements of Article 46(1)(b) of the Convention relating to these
aspects of the petition are satisfied.
3.
Duplication of procedures and international res judicata
51. It does
petition is
settlement,
any other
established
satisfied.
4.
not appear from the record that the subject matter of the
pending before another international proceeding for
nor that it reproduces a petition already examined by this or
international organization. Therefore, the requirements
in Articles 46(1)(c) and 47(d) of the Convention have been
Characterization of the facts alleged
6 See IACHR Report Nº 72/03, supra, para. 60; Report Nº 31/99 (Admissibility), Case
11.763, Plan de Sánchez Massacre, Guatemala, April 16, 1999, paras. 29 and 30.
11
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents