11 (b) To publish within six months, at least once in the official gazette and in another national newspaper, Chapter 1, entitled “Introduction of the case,” Chapter III, entitled “Jurisdiction” and Chapter VI, entitled “Proven facts,” as well as the operative paragraphs of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs (ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment of March 1, 2005). The State has complied with its obligation to make the publication in a national newspaper (supra Having seen paragraphs 5(e), 6(e) and 7(e)), taking into account the content of the Order of the Court of September 22, 2006.10 The State’s confirmation regarding the publication in the official gazette of El Salvador remains pending (supra Having seen paragraph 5(e)). 11. That the Court considers it essential that the State submit updated information on the following matters pending compliance: (a) The obligation to carry out an effective investigation into the reported facts in this case, identify and punish those responsible and conduct a genuine search for the victims, and eliminate all the obstacles and mechanisms de facto and de jure, which prevent compliance with these obligations in the instant case, so that it uses all possible measures, either through the criminal proceedings or by adopting other appropriate measures, and shall publicize the result of the criminal proceedings (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment of March 1, 2005). The State provided information on the measures and actions taken in the criminal proceedings before the First Trial Court of Chalatenango (supra Having seen paragraph 5(a)). However, in their observations, both the representatives and the Inter-American Commission agreed that the State had not acted with due diligence (supra Having seen paragraph 6(a) and 7(a)); (b) The “establishment of a national commission to trace young people who disappeared during the armed conflict when they were children, with the participation of civil society (seventh operative paragraph of the Judgment of March 1, 2005 and paragraphs 184 and 188 of the said): i) El Salvador has not provided all the information needed to evaluate whether the Inter-institutional Commission complies with each parameter for its functioning established by this Tribunal in the Judgment. Both the representatives and the Inter-American Commission have stated that this Inter-institutional Commission does not comply with these parameters (supra Having seen paragraph 6(b) and 7(b)). Therefore, the Court considers that the State must provided a detailed report on compliance with the parameters established in paragraphs 185 to 188 of the Judgment; ii) In the case of the Serrano Cruz sisters, based on the observations of the representatives and the Commission, the Court has verified that the and non-governmental authorities and institutions mentioned above, and also international links with the web pages of other States, national institutions or associations, and international organizations engaged in trying to trace children and young people who have disappeared, in order to promote, participate and collaborate in the establishment and development of an international search network” (underlining added). 10 Cf. Case of the Serrano Cruz Sisters. Compliance with Judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of September 22, 2006, tenth Considering paragraph.