Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 11, 2008 Case of Baena Ricardo et al. (270 Workers v. Panama) (Monitoring Compliance with Judgment) HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs issued by the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court,” “the Inter-American Court,” or “the Tribunal”) in the case of Baena Ricardo et al., February 2, 2001 (hereinafter “the Judgment”). 2. The Orders on monitoring compliance with the Judgment issued by the Court on June 21, 2002; November 22, 2002; June 6, 2003; and November 28, 2005. In the latter Order, the Tribunal: DECLAR[ED]: 1. That in accordance with Considering paragraph 27 of the […] Order, the State has fully complied with the obligation of paying the 270 victims the lump sum of US$ 100,000.00 (one hundred thousand dollars of the United States of America) as reimbursement for expenses, as well as US$ 20,000.00 (twenty thousand dollars of the United States of America) for the reimbursement of costs (ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment of February 2, 2001). 2. That in accordance with Considering paragraph 28 of the […] Order, the Inter-American Commission reimbursed the victims and their representatives to the amount of US$ 120,000.00 (one hundred and twenty thousand dollars of the United States of America), paid by the State for costs and expenses, as of which the ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment of Febrary 2, 2005, has been fully complied with. 3. That in accordance with Considering paragraph 29 of the Order, the State has partially complied with: a) the payment to the 270 victims of the amounts corresponding to lost salaries and other employment rights that they had claim to according to law, payment that, in the case of workers who may have passed away, should be made to their next of kin (sixth operating paragraph of the Judgment of February 2, 2001); and b) the payment to the 270 victims of the amount of US$ 3,000 (three thousand dollars of the United States of America) for non-pecuniary damages (eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment, February 2, 2001). 4. That the proceedure for the monitoring of compliance will remain open with regard to the operative paragraphs of the Judgment still pending compliance in the present case, in accordance with Considering paragraph 30 of the Order, namely: a) payment to to the 270 victims of the amounts that correspond to the lost salaries and other employment rights that they had claim to according to law, payment that, in the event that some workers have passed away, should be made to their next of kin (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment of February 2, 2001); b) the reinstatement of the 270 victims in their original positions, and if that is not possible, the offering of alternative employement that meets the conditions, salaries, and compensation they had at the moment of being fired. In the event that this is not possible either, the State must proceed with the payment of compensation that corresponds to the termination of employment, in keeping with internal labor laws. In the same way, the State must provide to