4
5.
The communication of August 19, 2004, in which the Inter-American
Commission forwarded the information requested and indicated that “the imminence
of damage in the cases of Ronald Ernesto Raxcacó-Reyes, Hugo Humberto RuizFuentes, Bernardino Rodríguez-Lara and Pablo Arturo Ruiz-Almengor arises from the
final nature of the judgments convicting them.” It also stated that, according to the
relevant provisions of the laws of Guatemala, if no appeal for amparo was pending a
decision, the judge for execution of sentences would indicate the date and time for
executing the death penalty and that, “[i]n this context, the adoption of provisional
measures by the Court is the appropriate means of avoiding the imminent
irreparable damage and ensuring the appropriate processing of the petitions filed
before the inter-American system.”
6.
The note of the Secretariat of the Court of August 20, 2004, in which, on the
instructions of the President, it requested the State to forward its observations on
the request for provisional measures submitted by the Commission (supra having
seen paragraph 1).
7.
On August 24, 2004, the State transmitted its observations on the request for
provisional measures submitted by the Inter-American Commission, and indicated
that various actions promoted by the Government “guarantee the protection of the
lives of those condemned to death, as regards suspending execution of the death
penalty while the appeal for clemency is decided at the domestic level, so that
sentences can be postponed or annulled by the exercise of the right to clemency.” In
this respect, it stated that the execution of Ronald Ernesto Raxcacó-Reyes, Hugo
Humberto Ruiz-Fuentes and Pablo Arturo Ruiz-Almengor had been suspended for five
years and of Bernardino Rodríguez-Lara for seven years. The State also provided
information on the measures being taken to reform the application of the death
penalty, through the preliminary draft laws: “Annulment of the death penalty in the
case of all crimes that contemplate this penalty in the Republic of Guatemala,” “Draft
law annulling laws that contemplate the death penalty,” and “draft law on the
signature and ratification of the Protocol to the American Convention on Human
Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty.” In addition, the State indicated that Messrs.
Raxcacó-Reyes, Ruiz-Fuentes and Rodríguez-Lara had filed appeals for commutation
of sentence before the Ministry of the Interior, which were pending a decision. The
State also advised that, in the case of Mr. Ruiz-Almengor “[t]he appeal for review
was pending a decision and the defense lawyer had not yet filed the appeal for
clemency.” Regarding the appeal for clemency or commutation of sentence, the
State indicated that this “is in force in Guatemala[; however,] a law is required
regulating the procedure, process and body that should hear the appeal.” Finally, the
State referred to the detention conditions of those condemned to death.
CONSIDERING:
1.
That Guatemala has been a State Party to the American Convention on
Human Rights since May 25, 1978, and accepted the obligatory jurisdiction of the
Court on March 9, 1987.
2.
That Article 63(2) of the American Convention establishes that:
In cases of extreme gravity and urgency, and when necessary to avoid irreparable damage
to persons, the Court shall adopt such provisional measures as it deems pertinent in
matters it has under consideration. With respect to a case not yet submitted to the Court, it
may act at the request of the Commission.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents