20 participation of the victims’ representatives and that there were some critical points as to the hiring of an entity to be in charge of the diagnosis stage. During the hearing, they stated that even though there was a significant delay at the beginning of the compliance with this measure, important progress has been made since the agreement with the UNDP and the hiring of specialized private organizations to provide treatment to the victims of this type of crimes. They acknowledged the willingness and flexibility that the State showed to carry out this measure. Currently, by the end of the diagnosis stage and the beginning of the treatment stage, they expressed the following concerns: i) the importante of considering that the diagnosis stage only covered a part of the victims; in this sense, the duty to look for the other people and include them in the process is still pending; ii) the need for the treatment stage to directly begin after the diagnosis stage, in order to avoid mistrust and the re-victimization of the victims; iii) the importance for the same organization that was in charge of the diagnosis to provide the treatment, in view of the reliable relationship built; iv) the implementation of this measure as to the health is still pending; therefore, they request the State to provide further information in order to learn more about the plan mentioned by the State and submit their comments. 52. That the Commission, in addition, positively valued the important progress made at the end of the diagnosis stage, but it is waiting for information regarding the second treatment stage and, particularly, the implementation in connection with health. Furthermore, it noted that, so far, the treatment refers to the psychological and psychosocial part, but the aspect of the medical treatment has still not been implemented. 53. That the Court values the actions taken as a part of execution of this measure as well as the willingness to include this aspect in the execution of the agreement mentioned by the State for the comprehensive treatment of the victims of the armed conflict from a psychosocial point of view. The Tribunal values the efforts shown by the State upon the execution of the agreement between the Ministry of Social Protection and the United Nations Development Program; the psychosocial nature of the measures that are being adopted and the investment and procedure in the system of evaluation and treatment. Moreover, this Tribunal expressed satisfaction that the State has adopted a comprehensive approach for the implementation of this measure, which includes the different cases where the Court has delivered judgments and ordered this measure of reparation. 54. That, in addition, the Court notes that the appropriate treatment for the victims’ next-of-kin was an obligation of immediate compliance on the part of the State. In this sense, it is worrying that the diagnosis of the next-of-kin, considering their treatment, has taken more than three years in being carried out. The Court hopes that the second stage of psychosocial treatment begins, forthwith, and for the State to adopt the remaining measures to implement the program of medical treatment and include, in the plans, the victims who have not been evaluated yet. Moreover, without detriment to the measures the State shall adopt within the framework of the general health system, it is necessary for the State to provide, free of charge, the victims of the instant case with thorough and comprehensive preferential treatment, including the medicines they may require. Certainly, the consent and cooperation of the beneficiaries of these measures are essential for the effective provision of the treatment owed to them. To this end, it is important that the State authorities continue having the cooperation of the representatives to include the rest of the people. The State has undertaken to guarantee that there will be no more interruptions between the diagnosis and treatment stages. Therefore, the State shall continuously inform, in time fashion, on the progress and results in the implementation of this measure.