4 c) Payment of compensation to Martín León Lunazco, son of the victim Máximo León León (subparagraph (c) of the second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); d) Deposit of the compensation amount corresponding to the beneficiaries of reparations who [were] minors in a “trust fund under the most favorable conditions according to Peruvian banking practices,” in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 35 of the judgment on reparations and the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth considering paragraphs of [the] Order; e) Payment of the compensatory interest on the arrears for the period during which it failed to deposit the compensation amounts corresponding to the beneficiaries who are minors in a trust fund, as stipulated in paragraph 36 of the judgment on reparations; f) The provision of educational and health services (third and fourth operative paragraphs of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); g) Implementation of the Court’s ruling in its judgment on interpretation of the judgment on merits in this case “regarding the meaning and scope of the declaration of ineffectiveness of Laws No. 26479 and [No.] 26492” (subparagraph (a) of the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001), should the State have any additional information to that which it ha[d] already forwarded to the Court; h) Progress in including “the most suitable legal classification” to define the crime of extrajudicial executions (subparagraph (b) of the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); i) Progress regarding accession to and ratification of the International Convention on the Non-applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (subparagraph (c) of the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); j) Publication of the judgment of the Court in the official gazette El Peruano and dissemination of its contents in other media (subparagraph (d) of the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); k) Inclusion in the Supreme Resolution ordering publication of the agreement of “a public expression of apology to the victims for the grave damages caused” and ratification of the determination not to allow this type of event to occur again (subparagraph (e) of the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); and l) The memorial to be erected (subparagraph (f) of the fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001). […] DECLARE[D]: 1. That, in accordance with the arrangements made by the parties in the reparations agreement, subsequently ratified by the Court in the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001, the manner in which the State [was to] make the payment of the compensation corresponding to the beneficiaries who [were] minors [was] by depositing the compensation amounts in a trust fund “under the most favorable conditions according to Peruvian banking practices.” 2. That the State [was to] defray any expenses arising from the trust fund. The State [was] not [to] deduct any percentage of the compensation corresponding to the minors for the administrative or financial expenses incurred by the trust company, to the detriment of the capital deposited in the trust fund.