9 publicize the findings of those investigations. The Commission therefore asked the Court to call upon the State to provide that information; b) the compensation ordered for the beneficiaries of Benedicta Yanque Churo and Mr. Tito Ricardo Ramírez Alberto has not been paid; c) the State provided no information concerning payment of the compensation ordered for Mr. Martín León Lunazco, son of victim Máximo León León; d) the State has not provided exact information as to the establishment of the trust funds ordered for the beneficiaries of the reparations who are minors. The State must immediately deposit, in the Banco de la Nación, the compensation owed to beneficiaries who are minors. It must also deposit any interest earned on that compensation and the accrued delinquency interest; e) in the case of the health and education benefits, the Commission acknowledges the State’s gestures regarding its intention to pay the medical expenses of the victims and their beneficiaries and regarding educational benefits. It noted, however, that the petitioners contend that the State has not recently reported who the beneficiaries of the educational measures are or on the actions it has taken since 2003; f) concerning the symbolic reparation, the State could be more specific as to when the agreed upon “memorial” will be erected and the commemorative image crafted, as “compliance with this obligation is not open-ended; instead, the symbolic reparation must materialize within a reasonable time period, no more than two years from the date on which the Judgment on reparations was delivered”; and g) the State did not provide any information on the progress made toward the inclusion of “the most suitable legal classification” to define the crime of extra-judicial executions, or on progress made toward the signing and ratification of the International Convention on the Non-applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, and the development of criminal proceedings, points on which it concurred with FEDEPAZ, on publication of the Court’s Judgment in the Official Gazette El Peruano and dissemination of its content via other media, inclusion of the Supreme Resolution ordering publication of the agreement on reparations, a public apology to the victims for the terrible harm caused, ratification of its determination that such events will never again happen, and application of what the Court ordered in its Judgment interpreting the Judgment on merits, and CONSIDERING THAT: 1. Oversight for compliance with its decisions is an authority inherent in the Court’s jurisdictional functions.