5 on November 25, 2000, and second of the Judgment on Reparations on February 22, 2002); c) measures adopted to hold a public event to recognize the liabilities for the facts of this Case and the compensation of the victims pursuant to the Court Judgment2; and d) the existence at the present time of legislative measures and any other measures to adapt the Guatemalan legal system to the international standards on human rights and give full effect (effet utile) to said standards at a domestic level. 8. After assessing publications printed by the State in “La Hora” Newspaper on March 3, 2003, the Court considers they do not comply with the Judgment on reparations (supra Having Seen 2 y 7). 9. Providing sufficient information on compliance with the Judgment is a duty of the State, repeatedly stated by this Court3. 10. Pursuant to the paragraph fulfilled by the State (supra Considering sixth), this Tribunal shall never demand any information whatsoever. 11. Pursuant to the paragraphs not fulfilled by the State (supra Considering seventh and eighth), the State should comply with them as soon as possible. The Court shall assess the general compliance status of its judgments on the merits (November 25, 2000) and reparations (February 22, 2002), upon receiving said State report and the corresponding observations of the representatives of the victims and the Commission. NOW THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to oversee compliance with its judgments and pursuant to the provisions of Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 2 Case Bámaca Velásquez. Reparaciones (art. 63.1 Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos), Sentencia de 22 de febrero de 2002. Series C No. 91, párr. 84. 3 Cf., Neira Alegría et al. Case. Compliance with judgment. November 28, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering nine; El Amparo Case. Compliance with judgment. November 28, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering eight; Loayza Tamayo Case. Compliance with judgment. November 27, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering eight; Castillo Páez Case. Compliance with judgment. November 27, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering nine; Garrido y Baigorria Case. Compliance with judgment. November 27, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering eight; Blake Case. Compliance with judgment. November 27, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering nine; Caballero Delgado and Santana Case. Compliance with judgment. November 27, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering six and seven; and Baena Ricardo et al. Case. Compliance with judgment. June 21, 2002 Order of the Court, Considering two; Baena Ricardo et al. Case. Compliance with judgment June 6, 2003 Order of the Court, Considering ten and twelve; and “The Last Temptation of Christ” (Olmedo Bustos et al.) Case. Compliance with judgment. November 28, 2003 Order of the Court, Considering ten.