Proposed by the representative 1) J’s partner, who shall testify on the manner in which the alleged actions of the State in this case have allegedly affected J and her life plan with her partner. 2) Susan Pitt, who will testify on J’s situation as an asylum seeker in the United Kingdom and the impact that being separated from her family had on J and on her family. This witness will also refer to the presumed effects on J of the alleged actions by the Peruvian State, regarding her new arrest in Germany, and the manner in which the alleged actions of the Peruvian State affected her life project. 3) Martin Rademacher, who will testify on the situation that J faced in Germany, in the context of her extradition, comment on aspects of the application for extradition by the Peruvian State, as it relates to this case, and will describe the presumed impact of J’s detention on her and on her family. Proposed by the State 4) Nancy de la Cruz Chamilco, who will testify on the medical examination performed on J, its results, the extent of her injuries and their location. 5) Pablo Talavera Elguera, who will testify on the criminal trial opened against Mrs. J and other defendants, the criminal charges brought against them, the warrants for her location and arrest, the extradition proceeding in the domestic courts and the confidentiality of the process against Mrs. J. 6) Ana María Mendieta, who will testify on the standards for the investigation of violence against women and the implementation of training programs for public officials. B. Expert witnesses proposed by the State 1) José María Asencio Mellado, a lawyer, who will render an expert opinion on the scope of criminal procedure law applicable to this case, and on the principles of ne bis in idem, criminal legality and retroactivity. 2) Miguel Ángel Soria Fuerte, a lawyer, who will render an expert opinion on the legal definition of types of conduct that may constitute torture and other cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment, as well as on the obligations of States in response to such actions. 3) Eduardo Alcocer Povis, lawyer, who will render an expert opinion on arrests in cases of flagrante delicto and the principle of ne bis in idem. 2. To require the representative and the State to submit, if considered pertinent, and within the non-renewable term that expires on April 23, 2013, any questions they consider appropriate through the Inter-American Court to the witnesses and expert witnesses specified in Operative para. 1 of this Order. Within that same term the Commission may submit any questions deemed pertinent regarding the expert opinions proposed by the State for which the Court granted it an opportunity to submit questions (supra Considering 17