13 * * * Implementing programs of education in human rights for members of the Armed Forces and of the National Police, and for Prosecutors and Judges 50. That as concerns the duty to implement, within a reasonable time, permanent programs of education in human rights for members of the Military Forces and National Police in all hierarchical levels, with a particular emphasis on the legitimate use of force and states of emergency; and for prosecutors and judges, on international standards related to the judicial protection of human rights (operative paragraph number ten in the Judgment), the State indicated that it is developing a pilot scheme to implement such permanent programs mainly targeting members of the Military Forces and National Police, and for prosecutors and judges. Likewise, the State indicated that a specialized course on human rights and democracy from the standpoint of the Inter-American System was held at the Third Army Division “Tarqui” from November 12 to 16, 2007. 51. That the State informed that there had been agreement on the revision of the “Manual de derechos humanos aplicados a la función policial” [Handbook on human rights as applied in police activities], for the purpose of including therein the human rights contents established in the course of the aforementioned training procedure (supra Considering Clause Number 50), underscoring that such handbook was to be published during the second half of the year 2009 and that during this same period a human rights training procedure would be commenced on the basis of the amendments thereof, for 200 National Police training staffers. Thus, every class in the Police taking their promotion courses would receive training in human rights, cutting across all the police subjects. 52. That the State also let the Court know that, as relates to the Armed Forces, for the second half of the year 2009, in the framework of an interinstitutional cooperation agreement, the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights would design a training module. Furthermore, in the course of the hearing the State delivered a copy of a cover page and of the contents of the “Manual de derechos humanos aplicados a la función policial” [Handbook on human rights as applied in police activities], of information about the human rights training process in progress at the national level for National Police personnel, in its approaches to human mobility, nondiscrimination, citizen security, states of exception, human trafficking, gender and the progressive use of force, as well as a report on the human rights training process in progress at the national level and at the northern frontier for the armed forces in its approaches to gender, security, states of exception, human mobility and the progressive use of force. 53. That the representatives stated that they knew that the State has training programs on the progressive use of force for members of the Police, but that they do not know the mechanism in use to disseminate the information and train all the members thereof, or whether such courses are part of the education curriculum for all hierarchical levels or whether they are imparted to all the security bodies. They also pointed out that ever since the Judgment was pronounced, the State has not established any permanent training program for the military. 54. That in the course of the hearing the State made reference to the circumstance that police training does touch upon the subject of the legitimate use of public force during states of exception and on that of citizen security, that the training workshops indeed are for all hierarchical levels, as well as for members of all