-8-
the Order of September 21, 2005 and to two requests effected by the President , by
means of his notes dated January 16 and 26, 2006. The State pointed out that:
a)
As far as the September 15, 2005 attack is concerned, “the prosecuting
investigation was commenced” and the “pertinent procedures” are in
progress;
b)
Regarding the desistment of the protection measures effected by Mr.
Ramírez-Hinostroza, it was decided to continue providing the aforementioned
protection, in charge of the police service, to the domicile of the aforesaid
party, until knowledge of his place of abode be acquired;
c)
on November 4, 2005, Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza communicated his
desistment to the security staff and did not allow them to accompany him,
pointing out that "he was going to prosecute them for harassment.” On that
same day, the aforesaid party indicated he would travel to the interior of the
country and that “he should not be followed.” In spite of the fact that Mr.
Ramírez-Hinostroza would not come back to his domicile, “police staff
continued to be detailed there to provide security service in favor of his
family. It came to be known by police authorities that the beneficiary would
have traveled to the city of Huancayo, for which reason word was sent to the
Departamento de Seguridad del Estado (State Security Department) of the
VII-DIRTELPOL-HUANCAYO of the possible sojourn of the [aforementioned]
party thereat[,…] for the purpose of providing him there with the security
measures due him in a discreet manner — given the attitude assumed by the
beneficiary and his waiver of the protection afforded him.” In the
abovementioned report, it was suggested that “it be resolved to permanently
discharge the current personal protection service in view of the express
waiver thereof” by Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza “and that [he] does not allow
those responsible for it to perform the task with which they have been
charged”;
d)
as of the date on which Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza subscribed
the desistment document, eight policemen in all, duly armed, were being
deployed for his benefit and that of his family, and the whole was split into
two groups detailed to 24-hour shifts. A bullet-proof vest was given Mr. Luis
Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, so that he could go out. Such personnel fended
off the alleged attacks of June 1 and of September 15, 2005. It was
furthermore decided to have it “taken into consideration when fixing the
Hojas de Ruta de Patrullaje Motorizado y a Pie (Itineraries for the Patrols on
Foot and in Motor Vehicles) to effect successive rounds, including the areas
lying close to the domicile of the aforementioned protected party.” Regarding
the provision of a vehicle, none is currently available;
e)
concerning the attempted suicide by Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza, on
November 20 2005 the wife of the aforesaid party requested support from a
mobile unit and he was taken to the Hospital Jorge Botto Bernales (“Jorge
Botto Bernales” Hospital) in the Santa Anita district, where he received care
and was diagnosed “Organic Phosphorated Poisoning – Attempted Suicide.”
Later on, the aforesaid party was taken to another hospital “where he was
admitted for observation and where he remained, waiting for the vacancy of a
bed to happen somewhere, so that he could be finally sent there.” Such
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents