3 11. The writings of December 29, 2008 and April 30, 2009 and their respective appendixes, submitted by the Centro por la Justicia y el Derecho Internacional (Center for Justice and International Justice, hereinafter, “CEJIL”), through which they referred to the compliance with the Judgment and submitted their observations to the information provided by the State. 12. The submissions of November 27, 2008; January 9, 12 and 21; and February 6, 2009 and their respective appendixes, made by the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas de la Ley 25 de 1990 de la República de Panamá (Organization of Workers Victims of Law No. 25 of 1990 of the Republic of Panama, hereinafter, “the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas de la Ley 25”), and other additional submissions, through which they dealt with the compliance with the Judgment. 13. The submission of May 12, 2009, through which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter, “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”), “owing to circumstances beyond its control”, requested a two-week time extension to submit its observations to the State’s report. 14. The communication of May 15, 2009, through which the Secretariat, following instructions of the President of the Court, informed the Commission that it should submit its observations no later than May 28, 2009. 15. The writing of June 8, 2009, through which the Inter-American Commission submitted its observations to the State’s report. 16. The submissions of some victims to whom the Secretariat, following orders from the President of the Court, ordered that they should be made through their legal representatives, CEJIL, the Organization of Workers Victims of Law No. 25 or the InterAmerican Commission, if they deemed it fit. CONSIDERING: 1. That monitoring the compliance with its decisions is an inherent jurisdictional power of the Court. 2. That Panama has been a State Party to the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”) as of June 22, 1978, and recognized the binding jurisdiction of the Court on May 9, 1990.