-15considered it would be proper and convenient to grant any of the requests made by the State. 88. On December 2, 2005, the common intervener filed a brief with its comments to the clarifications, explanations and documents submitted by Peru (supra para. 73.) By means of a note of December 22, 2005, the Secretariat, following the instructions of the President, requested the common intervener to forward the appendixes to such comments as soon as possible. On January 4, 2006, the common intervener submitted such appendixes. 89. On December 6, 2005, the State filed a brief and an appendix attached thereto, informing the Court that “ it submitted the listing of former workers comprised within the judgment by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) (07/08/98) and disclaimed any responsibility”, with reference to the explanatory statement regarding the scope of the acknowledgment of responsibility that had been requested by the President (supra para. 77.) 90. On December 6, 2005, the State filed another brief, to which it attached an appendix in order to submit information to provide evidence in support of the schedule of “Persons that must be excluded from the application” included in Appendix 23 of the brief of preliminary objections, regarding the information that had been requested by the President (supra para. 77.) 91. On December 12, 2005, the State filed a statement with reference to the report that had recently been issued by “the Fiscalía Superior Especializada de Lima (Office of the Specialized Superior Public Prosecutor of Lima) in case No. 039-2004, pending before the Tercera Sala Penal Especial de la Corte Superior de Lima (Third Special Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Lima)”, and the State informed that “it had requested a certified copy signed by a Public Notary in order to be submitted in full to the Honorable Court.” 92. On December 16, 2005, the Commission filed a copy of the original statement filed on November 3, 2005, which had been submitted to the Commission by Manuel Saavedra-Rivera, Héctor Paredes-Márquez and Carlos Cueva-Rojas, as well as its corresponding appendixes. 93. On December 19, 2005, Peru filed a brief containing “preliminary comments to the clarifications, explanations and documents that had been submitted by the other parties, in answer to the request made by the Court after the final oral arguments at the public hearing and by means of notes dated October 14, 2005, as well as its comments to the documents attached to the final written arguments (supra paras. 72, 74 and 85.) 94. On December 21, 2005, the State filed a brief together with an appendix by means of which it submitted a certified copy of the report issued on November 10, 2005 by the Tercera Fiscalía Superior Especializada de Lima (Office of the Third Specialized Superior Public Prosecutor of Lima) in case No. 039-2004, and also a copy of the Official Letter N° 764-2005 of the ad hoc Public Prosecutor (supra para. 91.) 95. On December 21, 2005, the State filed another brief with appendixes in order to submit a “schedule of correlation of cases and causes.” On that same day, it