58 49(19) The women who were raped by the State agents on the day of the massacre, and who survived the massacre, still suffer from that attack. The rape of women was a State practice, executed in the context of massacres, designed to destroy the dignity of women at the cultural, social, family and individual levels. These women consider themselves stigmatized in their communities and have suffered from the presence of the perpetrators in the town’s common areas. Also, the continuing impunity of the events246 has prevented the women from taking part in the legal proceedings. Regarding the expenses arising from the representation of the victims before the inter-American system for the protection of human rights 49(20) The victims have been represented in the proceedings before the InterAmerican Commission and Court by members of the Center for Legal Action on Human Rights (CALDH), who have incurred a series of expenses.247 VIII REPARATIONS APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 63(1) Obligation to Repair 50. In accordance with the judgment on merits in this case delivered by the Court on April 29, 2004, and the terms of the State’s acknowledgement of international responsibility, the latter violated the rights embodied in Articles 5(1) and 5(2) (Right to Humane Treatment), 8(1) (Right to a Fair Trial), 11 (Right to Privacy), 12(2) and 12(3) (Freedom of Conscience and Religion), 13(2)(a) and 13(5) (Freedom of notary public by Eulalio Grave Ramírez on March 9, 2004, (file on preliminary objections and merits and reparations, tome III, folios 489 to 502); testimony of Juan Manuel Jerónimo given before the InterAmerican Court during the public hearing held on April 23, 2004; testimony of Buenaventura Manuel Jerónimo given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 23, 2004; testimony of Narcisa Corazón Jerónimo given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 23, 2004, and report of Nieves Gómez Dupuis given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 24, 2004. 245 Cf. statement made before notary public by Benjamín Manuel Jerónimo on March 9, 2004, (file on preliminary objections and merits and reparations, tome III, folios 470 to 488); statement made before notary public by Eulalio Grave Ramírez on March 9, 2004, (file on preliminary objections and merits and reparations, tome III, folios 489 to 502); testimony of Juan Manuel Jerónimo given before the InterAmerican Court during the public hearing held on April 23, 2004; testimony of Buenaventura Manuel Jerónimo given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 23, 2004; testimony of Narcisa Corazón Jerónimo given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 23, 2004, and report of Nieves Gómez Dupuis given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 24, 2004. 246 Cf. report of Nieves Gómez Dupuis given before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on April 24, 2004, and CEH report, supra note 238, tome III, p. 13, para. 2351. 247 Cf. power of attorney granted to CALDH to act as the representatives in the case before the Inter-American Court (file of appendixes to the application, tome II, appendix 19, folios 969 to 972), and vouchers for expenditures provided by the representatives in their final arguments brief (file of appendixes to the final arguments brief of the victims’ representatives, tome I, appendixes G-1 to G-7, folios 228 to 383 and tome II, appendixes G-7 to G-14, folios 384 to 521).