89 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. TOTAL Irene Soto Tejeda Hilario Soto Tejeda Macario Soto Tejeda Cecilio Soto Tejeda Margarito Soto Tejeda Sabino Soto Tejeda Julián Tecú Chajáj Cecilio Tecú Chajáj Lorenza Tecú Chajáj Pedro Tecú Manuel Bartolomé Tecú Manuel Carlota Tecú Manuel Victoria Tecú Manuel María Antonia Tecú Morales Paulina Tecú Morales Gregorio Tejeda Orellana Bartolo Tejeda Orellana Isabel Tejeda Orellana Hilaria Tejeda Orellana Antonio Tejeda Everildo Tejeda Lázaro Alvarado Raxcacó US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$20,000.00 US$3,620,000.00 D) OTHER FORMS OF REPARATION Arguments of the Commission 90. The Commission indicated that: a) The measures of reparation to try and eradicate the effects of the violations committed by the State can only be determined from a collective perspective, based on an understanding of the socio-cultural characteristics of the Mayan people, such as their cosmovision, spirituality and community social structure, and recognizing the magnitude of the genocidal acts committed against them; b) As a measure of satisfaction, the acknowledgement of international responsibility made by the State during the public hearing held before the Court should be publicized and its scope and consequences should be explained by a high-ranking State official in the Plan de Sánchez community; c) The Court should order the State to apologize to the next of kin of the victims of Plan de Sánchez, and this apology should be transmitted directly to all the members of the community in their village by a high-ranking State official; d) The Plan de Sánchez community, and Guatemalan society in general, were victims of the cloak of silence and disinformation that was spread as a result of the violence and “institutionalized terror.” This practice created an environment of distrust among the members of the Plan de Sánchez community, modifying their community customs and fostering isolation. Accordingly, one measure of reparation should be addressed at publicizing what