2 notification of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 160, 168 and 169 through 173 of this Judgment[, and] 9. [t]he Court will monitor compliance with this Judgment and will consider this case closed once the State has fully implemented all of the provisions of this Judgment. Within one year of notification of this Judgment, Ecuador must present a report of the measures taken in its compliance to the Court, in the terms of paragraph 174 of this Judgment. 2. The communications presented by the State of Ecuador (hereinafter “Ecuador” or “the State”) on September 25, 2006; September 6, 2007; and December 20, 2007, through which it informed, inter alia: a) as to its obligation to publish, at least once in Ecuador’s Official Daily and another daily with high national circulation, both the section entitled “Proven Facts” and the judgment’s operative paragraphs, that: i. the publication was carried out on September 20, 2006, in the Official Registry of Ecuador, Nº 360, and ii. the publication in a daily with high national circulation was carried out on December 29, 2006, in the daily “La Hora”’; b) as to the obligation to eliminate the criminal record of Mr. Rigoberto Acosta Calderón from the public registries, that Mr. Acosta Calderón’s name is not found registered in the Central National Archive of the National Police, nor in the database administered by the Consejo Nacional de Control de Sustancias Estupefacientes y Psicotrópicas (National Council for the Control of Narcotics), and c) regarding payments to Mr. Acosta Calderón for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, as well as the reimbursement of expenses to CEDHU and messers. Alejandro Ponce Villacís and Acosta Calderón, that: i. on December 27, 2006, the State made a payment of US$62,000 to Mr. Acosta Calderón for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, and reimbursed costs and expenses through a certificate of deposit in the Banco de Guayaquil. In addition ii. the State, on October 4, 2006, paid US$5,000 and US$2,000 to the Comisión Ecuménica de Derechos Humanos and to Dr. Alejandro Ponce Villacis, respectively, for costs and expenses. 3. The communication presented by the representatives of the victim and his next of kin (hereinafter, “the representatives”) on July 30, 2007 and February 1, 2008, in which they expressed, inter alia: