7 19. The Commission noted with satisfaction the measures adopted by the State in this regard. However, in relation to the question made by the representatives regarding the refund of a percentage of the money, it indicated that "it waits for the State to present information regarding this circumstance, in order to consider this aspect of the Judgment to be fulfilled". 20. As to the observation made by the representatives, in relation to the fact that the State would have requested the refund of a percentage of the money, Colombia informed that it forwarded to the representatives a communication in which “it explained the procedure followed to convert the sum ordered in the Judgment to pesos [and] that the Governor of the community of Jambaló did not make any observation to the explanation provided and refunded the corresponding sum of money to the Ministry of National Defense ". The Commission found this explanation to be, in principle, reasonable. Moreover, the information provided by the State was not contested by the representatives in their observations to the State’s report and there is no record in the case file showing how the State did not comply with this measure of reparation. 21. Based on the foregoing, the Court declares that the State has complied with operative paragraph ten of the Judgment. * * * 22. As to the obligation to grant to Myriam Zapata Escué a scholarship for university studies (operative paragraph eleven of the Judgment), the State pointed out that “the Ministry of National Education entered into an interadministrative agreement with the Colombian Institute of Educational Credit and Technical Studies Abroad (ICETEX) […], to establish an Administration Fund named after Escué Zapata - Judgment of the Inter-American Court", by means of which the amount of two hundred and seven million six hundred and ninety-four thousand four hundred and eighty-two pesos ($207.694.482,00) was delivered "to guarantee full coverage of the academic, lodging and transport expenses that Myriam Zapata Escué may incur into from the city where she studies to the community, during the length of the career she chose to study, that is, five years". As a result, it requested the Court to consider this measure of reparation to be fulfilled. 23. The representatives did not forward any observations in relation to the information recently presented by the State, despite the Secretary, following instructions from the President, requested them to present such observations on two occasions11. 24. The Commission did not present observations in that regard either. 25. The Court values the steps taken by the State in order to grant to Myriam Zapata Escué a scholarship for university studies, as ordered in the Judgment. However, it requests the representatives and the Inter-American Commission to forward the observations to what was informed by the State, after which the Tribunal shall assess whether this operative paragraph has been fulfilled. * * * 26. As to the obligation to provide the specialized medical, psychiatric and mental appropriate treatment required by Mrs. Etelvina Zapata Escué, Myriam Zapata Escué, Bertha Escué Coicue and Francya Doli Escué Zapata and Mr. Mario 11 Secretariat’s notes of April 28, 2010 (REF: CDH-10.171/220) and of May 12, 2010 (REF.: CDH-10.171/224).