9 her from being reinstated to the Constitutional Court, due to legal impediment. g. The Government used problems of a family or a business nature to impose arbitrary legal sanctions through judges or prosecutors, which threaten the honor and freedom of the persons involved. As a result, she requested that: a. While the proceeding on the reinstatement of the [j]ustices of the Constitutional Court is being heard, the State of Peru abstain from [harassing her] directly or [harassing her] husband, using its control over the judges and courts and manipulating them. b. Specifically, the judicial proceeding filed against [her] before the Fifteenth Court for Crimes included in Administrative Resolution No. 744-CME-PJ -Exp. No. 16072000, for the alleged crimes of misappropriation, fraud and misuse of public documents, be suspended until the proceeding for [her] reinstatement as a Constitutional Justice has been decided. c. Delia Revoredo de Mur and Jaime Mur Campoverde be guaranteed [the] right to judicial protection of their patrimonial interests, and their company, Corporación de Productos Alimenticios Nacionales PYC S.A. be allowed the legal remedy of appeal against an adverse arbitration award. 33. In an order of April 7, 2000, the President of the Court requested the State to adopt any necessary measures to ensure the physical safety and mental and moral integrity of Delia Revoredo Marsano, “so that the provisional measures that the Court m[ight] order for her c[ould] have the pertinent effect”. 34. On April 20, 2000, the Commission requested the Court to “[r]atify the [urgent] measures ordered by the President of the Court on April 7, 2000, for Delia Revoredo Marsano de Mur.” The State did not submit the reports requested in the President’s order. 35. By an order of August 14, 2000, the Court adopted provisional measures, which ratified the President’s order of April 7, 2000, and requested the State to maintain the necessary measures to protected the physical safety, and mental and moral integrity of Delia Revoredo Marsano. It also requested the State to report on the protection measures that it had adopted by September 14, 2000, at the latest. Lastly, it requested Peru to investigate the facts and report every two months on the provisional measures taken, and the Inter-American Commission to forward its comments on those reports within six weeks of receiving them. 36. When this judgment was delivered, the State had not submitted the reports requested by the Court’s order of August 14, 2000. However, on September 21, 2000, the Commission submitted a report on the situation of Delia Revoredo Marsano. VI EVIDENCE A) DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE