2 those persons who have not signed the agreements or who subsequently withdrew their consent. 5. To request the State of Panama to present to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, by November 15, 2010, at the latest, a report indicating the measures adopted to comply with this Order and to forward the documentation of the payments and bank deposits made for the third annual disbursement, and the other information requested in th[e] Order. […] 3. The briefs of July 30, September 24 and November 17, 2010, and their attachments, in which the Republic of Panama (hereinafter, the “State” or “Panama”) presented its report and additional information on compliance with the judgment. 4. The note of the Secretariat of the Inter-American Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of November 19, 2010, in which, on the instructions of the President of the Inter-American Court (hereinafter “the President”) and based on the fourth operative paragraph of the Order of May 28, 2010, it requested the State to submit: “(a) an individualized list of the persons who collected the amounts corresponding to the third annual disbursement established in the agreements, indicating the respective amounts, as well as the persons who did not do so, either because they had not signed the agreements or because inheritance procedures remained pending, and (b) copies of the documentation of said payments and the deposit of guarantee certificates.” 5. The briefs of November 29 and December 10, 2010, and their attachments, in which the State forwarded “copy of the receipts for the payments made in September 2010, as well as of the bank deposits for those who had not signed the settlement agreements, and of charts with details of the payments made” and “copy of the guarantee certificates corresponding to September 2010 for the three […] who did not sign the settlement agreement.” 6. The brief of February 1, 2011, and its attachments, in which Panama forwarded information additional to its report on compliance with the judgment. 7. The brief of May 17, 2010, and other briefs that had been submitted, in which the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas de la Ley 25 de 1990 de la República de Panamá (hereinafter “Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas”) referred to compliance with the judgment. 8. The briefs of May 27 and June 3, 4 and 29, 2010, in which the different persons who alleged that the represented the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas clarified “that [they are] lawyers in the Republic of Panama as regards everything relating to [...] domestic law” and “clarified that the [Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas] continued to represent” 15 victims in the case. 9. The Secretariat's notes of June 21 and July 6, 2010, in which, on the instructions of the President of the Court, it recalled that the “the Court will only respond to communications that come directly from the Organización de Trabajadores Víctimas [… and that] any other communication the victims represented by the said Organization or their lawyers wish to submit at the domestic level, must be submitted through the said Organization.” 10. The brief of January 19, 2011, in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) submitted its observations on the State’s report and on the observations of the