12 positively the State's commitment to provide medical and psychological care to the beneficiary due to the effects she has suffered as a consequence of the aforementioned incidents. 36. The Court recalls that in its Order of January 31, 2008, it asked the parties to provide detailed and current information on the measures that have been adopted and put in place by the State to effectively protect the life and personal integrity of Luisa María Escudero Jiménez.18 In this regard, it notes that as of March of 2009, it had not received detailed information - apart from information on the medical care provided - on the specific situation of this beneficiary or the protective and security measures implemented to her benefit. The Tribunal observes that the State reported that the protective measures implemented in this case are collective and therefore cover the relatives of beneficiary Mery Naranjo. However at the same time, it notes that those measures are designed in such a way as to protect the relatives of that beneficiary who live with her. In that sense, the Court takes note that according to the latest information submitted by the parties on this, beneficiary Luisa María Escudero does not live in the home of Ms. Mery Naranjo, for which reason she is not covered by the protective and security measures implemented to Ms. Naranjo’s benefit. Likewise, it observes that the only effective measure which has benefited Luisa María Escudero Jiménez is the transportation support, which has been suspended by the State since June of 2010 (supra Considering 11). Consequently, the Tribunal finds it necessary for the State and the representatives to submit detailed and current information on the present situation, particularly on her place of residence and the protective measures implemented by the State to the benefit of beneficiary Luisa María Escudero Jiménez. 1.3 On the alleged attention of Juan David Naranjo Jiménez 37. Colombia reported that beneficiary Juan David Naranjo Jiménez had been convicted through a judgment dated August 2, 2006, for drug trafficking and narcotics fabrication. The execution of that sentence had been suspended and he was placed on probation. However, on January 25, 2008, he was caught in flagrante delicto committing the crime of theft. The beneficiary pled guilty to the charges brought against him by the Office of the Public Prosecutor for the crimes of grand and aggravated larceny with possession and trafficking of firearms, for which reason he was assigned a measure of “interinstitutional supervision" in the Bellavista penitentiary. Later, the State reported that upon request from the beneficiaries, in November of 2008 Mr. Juan David Naranjo Jiménez was transferred to the “La Ceja Medium Security Penitentiary Facility (Antioquia),” as he had been subjected to harassment by one of those allegedly responsible for the facts leading to these provisional measures, who was interned in the Bellavista Prison. 19 Regarding the measures implemented for his protection, Colombia indicated that, as he was an inmate, the measures were aimed at other needs and the La Ceja penitentiary "implemented all the protective measures necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of the beneficiary." 38. Later, the State reported that on November 23, 2009, conditional liberty was granted. During that time, he lived with Ms. Mery Naranjo, for which reason “he was covered by the security and protective measures granted to her." Nevertheless, in its most recent report, Colombia indicated that "on April 17, 2010, […] Juan David Naranjo […] was arrested for the alleged crime of illegally carrying a weapon” after he was found with a firearm without the corresponding permit. With regard to this, it indicated that 18 Cf. Matter of Mery Naranjo et al. Order of the Court of January 31, 2008, supra footnote 14, Considering 25, and Matter of Mery Naranjo et al. Provisional Measures regarding Colombia. Order of the Court of September 22, 2006, Operative Paragraph 3. 19 The State indicated that the relatives of beneficiary Juan David Naranjo Jiménez have reported that the alleged perpetrator of the homicide of Ana Teresa Yarce - an incident that, among others, led to the adoption of these provisional measures - “was trying to persuade Mr. Naranjo to intercede with his mother, Ms. Mery Naranjo, to get her to withdraw the complaint against him."