17 doing so, the Court shall follow the rules of reasonable credit and weight analysis, within the applicable legal framework. A) Documentary Evidence 71. The documentary evidence submitted by the State includes a witness statement in response to the Order of the Court of February 7, 2006 (supra para. 20) and an expert report pursuant to the Order of the President of the Court of March 24, 2006 (supra para. 27). Such testimonies are summarized as follows: a) Statement of Mr. Cristián Correa-Montt, witness proposed by the State The witness made a statement “concerning the reparation measures established by the Chilean State in favor of the victims of human rights violations committed by the dictatorship that ruled from 1973 to 1990.” According to the witness, as a result of its efforts, the Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (National Truth and Reconciliation Commission) “submitted a report with facts concerning the way human rights were violated, including a summary of the main facts of all the prosecutions that resulted in convictions and a list of all pending cases.” As part of the recommendations of the Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (National Truth and Reconciliation Commission), and in order to implement a policy of reparation for the victim's next of kin, the Corporación Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación (National Corporation for Reparation and Reconciliation) was created under Law No. 19.123 of February 8, 1992 (hereinafter “Law No. 19.123”). Its purpose “was to coordinate, implement and promote all such actions as were necessary for complying with the recommendations of the Report issued by the Commission.” In addition, Law No. 19.123 provided for other reparation measures: a reparation pension, the amount of which should vary according to the kinship with the victim; health benefits consisting of free assistance in institutions depending on the National Health Care System; educational benefits and the option to be exempted from mandatory military service for the children of victims. As the process leading to the recognition of human rights violations and reconciliation continued, the State instituted several reparation measures, including: a) “Programa de Apoyo a los Presos Políticos (Political Prisoners Support Program)” for individuals kept in custody as of March 11, 1990, which sought to provide financial support to assist them in reintegrating into society and being pardoned and/or in having their sentences commuted in order for them to regain freedom; b) “Programa de Reparación y Atención Integral de Salud (PRAIS) (Comprehensive Health Service and Reparation Program)” for those affected by human rights violations; c) “Corporación Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación (National Reparation and Reconciliation Corporation),” created by Law No. 19.123 as the follow-up to the Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (National