12 its Judgment,15 so that it can become an effective tool to determine the whereabouts of Ernestina and Erlinda Serrano-Cruz. In view of the foregoing, the State shall provide the Court with detailed and up-to-date information regarding the launch of the web page according to the abovementioned conditions. * * * 42. As regards the publication of the parts of the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs rendered by the Court in the Official Gazette (ninth operative paragraph and paragraph 195 of the Judgment and tenth Considering clause of the Order on Compliance with Judgment of September 22, 2006), the State has confirmed the publication of the pertinent parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette of El Salvador and submitted a copy thereof. 43. The representatives made no additional observations regarding this measure. 44. In its January 10, 2008 brief, the Commission expressed its satisfaction with said publication. 45. Based on the information provided by the parties, the Court finds that this measure of reparation has been complied with. THEREFORE, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 25(1) and 30 of the Statute and 31(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court,16 DECLARES, 1. That, in accordance with Considering clause No. 45 of this Order, the State has complied with its obligation to: f) publish, at least once, the parts of the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs rendered by the Court in the Official Gazette (ninth operative paragraph and paragraph 195 of 15 Cf. Case of the Serrano-Cruz Sisters, supra note 12, paras. 189 to 191. Rules of Procedure of the Court approved during its 85th Regular Period of Sessions, held from November 16 to 28, 2009. 16