2 6. The other claims of the application are dismissed as unfounded[;] 7. The State shall submit a report to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights every six months from the date of notification of [the] Judgment, recounting the measures it has taken to comply with said Judgment[, and] 8. The Court will oversee compliance with this Judgment and will regard the present case closed once the State has fully carried out the terms of [the] Judgment. […] 2. The Order on Compliance with Judgment issued by the Court on November 28, 2005, by means of which the Court declared: 1. [t]hat in accordance with Considering paragraph eighth of the […] Order, the State has complied with that which is specified in the fifth operative paragraph of the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs in relation to the payment of expenses accrued during the international proceedings before the inter-American system of protection of human rights[;] 2. [t]hat it will keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with the aspects pending compliance, namely the obligations to: a) “refrain from charging Mr. José María Cantos the filing fee and fine levied for failure to pay the filing fee on time” (first operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002); b) “set in a reasonable sum the regulated fees in the Argentine Supreme Court case C-1099, as stipulated in paragraphs 70(b) and 74 [of the Judgment;]” (second operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002); c) “pay the fees and expenses of all experts and attorneys engaged by the State and the Province of Santiago de Estero, under the conditions set forth in the preceding point[;]” (third operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002); and d) “lift the attachments, general property encumbrances and other measures that were ordered against the properties and business assets of Mr. José María Cantos in order to guarantee payment of the court filing fee and the professional fees” (fourth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002). AND DECIDE[D]: 1. [t]o call upon the State to adopt such measures as may be necessary to promptly and effectively comply with the pending measures ordered by the Court in the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs of November 28, 2002, pursuant to Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights[;] 2. [to] request that by no later than March 6, 2006, the State submit a report specifying all such measures that may have been adopted to comply with the reparations ordered by this Court and which are still pending compliance, as