15 56. They are obligations to do. And, among them, is the obligation to identify, prosecute, and punish the perpetrators of the crimes of State, who, due to their actions (or omissions), incurred in international criminal responsibility, besides compromising the international responsibility of their State, on behalf of who they acted (or omitted), in the execution of a criminal policy of the State. 44 It is not about merely individual acts (or omissions), but of a criminality organized by the State itself. 45 Thus, it becomes necessary to take into account, jointly, the international criminal responsibility of the individuals involved as well as the State’s international responsibility, essentially complementary; the aggravated international responsibility corresponds to the crime of State of the State in question. 46 57. The present Judgment of the Court in the case of the Castro Castro Prison contemplates and effectively orders a series of obligations to do, in its chapter XVI, on reparations. These are particularly ample, from the compensations up to measures of satisfaction and non-repetition of the injurious acts. Among the latter (non-pecuniary reparations), I can mention the identification, prosecution, and punishment of those responsible; and educational measures, as well as of medical and psychological assistance. The Court, once more, has correctly considered Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention in their inseparability. 47 And, likewise, correctly pointed out that gross violations, such as those of the present case, to human rights (made up, in my opinion, by crimes of State) violate the international jus cogens. 48 VII. The Need and Importance of the Gender Analysis. 58. The present case cannot be adequately examined without a gender analysis. Remember that, as a first step, the United Nations Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, 1979) advanced on a holistic vision of the matter, tackling women’s rights in all areas of life and in all situations (in fact, I would even add in the light of the cas d'espèce, in the deprivation of freedom); the Convention cries out for the modification of socio-cultural patterns of behavior (Article 5) and highlights the principle of equality and nondiscrimination, 49 - a principle that the Inter-American Court has already determined, in its transcendental Advisory Opinion n. 18 (of 09.17.2003) on the Juridical Condition and Rights of Undocumented Migrants, that belongs to the domain of the jus cogens (paras. 97-111). 50 59. The present Judgment of the Court in the case of the Castro Castro Prison correctly warns of the need of the gender analysis, since, in that specific case, . Cf., in this sense, R. Maison, La responsabilité individuelle pour crime d'État en Droit international public, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2004, pp. 22, 30, 262-263, 286, 367, 378, 399, 409, 437, and 509-513. 44 . Ibid., pp. 24 and 251. . Ibid., pp. 294, 298 and 412. . Operative paragraph n. 6, and corresponding whereas paragraphs. . Cf. paragraphs 203 and 271. 45 46 47 48 . E.A. Grannes, The United Nations Women's Convention, Oslo, Institutt for offentlig Retts skriftserie (n. 13), 1994, pp. 3, 9, and 20-21. 49 . 50 And cf. Concurring Opinion of the Judge A.A. Cançado Trindade, paras. 58 and 65-85.